其一伞，一些小狗小料

xygbd

首先是作文

AA：我找到了大全，就是这道原题。下面附上范文。

“A year ago Apex Manufacturing bought its managers computers for their homes and paid for telephone connections so that they could access Apex computers and data files from home after normal business hours. Since last year, productivity at Apex has increased by 15 percent. Other companies can learn from the success at Apex: given home computers and access to company resources, employees will work additional hours at home and thereby increase company profits.”
Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.

In this article the author attributes Apex Manufacturing’s 15 percent increase in productivity over the past year to its decision to equip its manager with computers and paid telephone connections for their homes so that they would access company computers and files from home after normal business hours. On the basis of Apex’s experience the author recommends that other companies follow Apex’s example and provide computers and access to company resources to their employees. The author believes that such a policy would increase productivity and profits for other companies, just as it did for Apex. The author’s line of reasoning is questionable for several reasons.
First, the author assumes that Apex’s increase in productivity is due to its equipping its managers with home computers and access to company resources. However, the only evidence offered in support of this claim is the fact that Apex’s increase in productivity occurred after the home computers and after-hours access was provided. Unfortunately, this evidence is insufficient to establish the causal claim in question. While temporal precedence is one of the conditions required to establish a causal relationship between two events, by itself it is not a sufficient condition. Consequently, it is possible that Apex’s increase in productivity is not related to its decision to equip its managers with computers and after-hours access in the fashion required by the author’s argument.
Second, the author assumes that Apex and other companies are sufficiently similar to warrant a conclusion based on an analogy between them. Even if we accept the view that Apex’s increase in productivity was brought about by its policy of enabling its managers to work from home, differences between Apex and other companies could nullify this result. Lacking detailed information about Apex and the other companies in question it is difficult to assess the author’s conclusion.
In conclusion, the author’s argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to provide additional evidence for the claim that Apex’s decision to provide its managers with home computers and access to company resources was responsible for its increase in productivity. Furthermore, it would be necessary to show that Apex and other companies are sufficiently similar to justify the analogy between them.

AI：随着经济全球化的发展，作为全球的公民比作为一个特殊国家的公民的角色更加重要。（The role of be citizens of world is more important than  be   citizens of the particular country)

数学狗：
1. 机经里的第12题，补充条件说1ton=2000 pounds，原来车子的净重是1100pounds，然后求的是近似的值，因为有派，答案有10,12等。
2，机经里的136题，图中的S并没有给出数标的，我看机经的时候以为是给出的是0，所以提一下.
3，机经里的147题，是选E选项，因为算出来N=12M+5，然后依次将n=1,2,3,4。。。带进去的时候，刚好算出的数值都不在其他选项当中，就E 符合，大家上场时依次带入就行了，不难。
4，是说每个产品单价为12刀，利润是-（X-2)^2+n（具体公式不太记得了），这个单位是以千计算的，问生产3000单位时，比生产4000单位的成本少多少，这里要注意的是一些是以千位作为换算，要注意一下

大概就记得这些，有些机经上有，有些也记不着了，楼主GMAT悲剧了，不想抱怨，一直受惠于CD，想着自己也做些什么报答大家，接下来考的同学们，一定加油啊~~^^

晶晶明明

谢谢楼主 加油

晶晶明明

既有原题又有范文 真的很给力 感谢分享

晶晶明明

顶起来

ropingmoon

谢谢啦~好好休息！晚安哈~