【 M51,V29..出来遛狗。】

manna

M51,V29.
个人感觉V败在了SC上，所以就不提供SC的JJ了，怕误导大家。贴一下RC和CR的JJ。

CR：
1．    A城卖一种物品M，B城也卖这种物品M。但是M在B城的平均价格要比A城高，专家分析说这是因为B城有许多商店，价格抬高是因为这些商店之间存在竞争。于是A城决定增加商店的数目以获利。问support
我选的是A城的商店将吸引周围城市的人来

2．    两个小组对比实验，伞那题。我也选D，就是人们会把现实和故事联系在一起。

3．    一个工厂排放的水里带有某些化学物质，专家觉得如果将水直接倒掉太浪费了，应该利用起来，给植物灌溉。问削弱。我选的是：这种水里含有某种盐度，这种盐度是不利于灌溉的。

4．    一个城市，每卖一公升的油要多收3美分的税。这个城市the miles for driving近年了增加了X（X是个数值），但是所得的税却没有增加。问解释。我选的是：因为现在的车子跑1公里所耗的油减少了。



RC：
1.    工具
文章结构JJ里说的很全了 我说下问题
（1）主旨题 我选的是说明为什么这种工具具有独特性
（2）为什么这种工具在这个地方被广泛使用 我选的是人口密度高
（3）问第二段的作用 我选的是排除了其他可能性

2.  Trade promotion
（1）manufacture做广告的目的是什么? 我选的是提醒customer有降价活动
（2）作者同意以下哪个观点？ 我选的是customer总是认为降价活动和零售商的关系要大于和manufacture的关系
（3）那家尿布(diaper) 生产商又转回了原来的促销方式说明了什么？我选diaper生厂商意识到行业内如果有很多竞争者都采用降价的活动的话自己其实是不盈利的（选A）
我碰到的题目和前两个考古一样，不是markdown和return那篇

3．英属日耳曼语系——Latin
（1） 为什么后来translation这个职业盛行？ 我选的是因为有一些中产阶级需要读literature
（2）第三段有考点。题目问的是以下哪个正确的（好像是这么问的，不确定）。但答案选的是中产阶级中不热衷于做XX事的那部分人did not……定位第三段第一句
我做的时候没有问到下列哪一项不是latin多的原因。原JJ作者说选Shakespeare那项。这句话在第一段里提到过，

4． 电脑的软件和硬件
Hardware的development使得电脑变得越来越小。1980-1985年，由于software的发展，顾客愿意花非常多的钱来改装他们的电脑。但在1990年的时候，即便电脑硬件软件又发展了，顾客在这上面花的钱却明显少多了。为什么呢？因为电脑发展太快，使得顾客的需求饱和，而没有能力去使用它们。所以文章提出了电脑制造商要考虑的是怎么满足顾客的需要而不是怎么制造电脑。
作者又举了两个公司的例子：公司A呢bla bla bla（大致介绍了下优点），而公司B相比于A虽然有更好的制造能力，但它产的软件都只能适用于本公司的产品。B应该像A一样，将制造的软件运用于更多的computers。

（1）    主旨：电脑制造商要考虑的是怎么满足顾客的需要而不是怎么制造电脑。
（2）    以下哪个对B的描述是正确的？我选虽然有很好的制造软件的能力，但不能适用于很多电脑。
（3） 1980-1990发生了什么？ 大家注意，要选有转折词的那个。因为这里1980-1985是个时间段，1990又是个时间点。我选的是：开始顾客会愿意花很     多钱买硬件软件但是后来几乎就没有人买了（好像选B）

CR我暂时就想了这么多。明天接着想。M我遇到了好多狗狗，都在JJ贴里了，大家认真看应该就没问题了。
哎，继续睡觉去了。

fdx3000

谢谢LZ分享

紫苏0709

谢谢楼主的热狗~~~
数学满分。。。膜拜一下。。

RHUL

感谢楼主&膜拜数学满分。。。我1战是M50 V30总分才660。。。这个分真是很难说

忽然忘了解脱

LZ,不说啥了，你懂的~~~~~

THX




Most pre-1990 literature on busi-

nesses’ use of information technology

(IT)—defined as any form of computer-

Linebased information system—focused on

(5)spectacular IT successes and reflected

a general optimism concerning IT’s poten-

tial as a resource for creating competitive

advantage.  But toward the end of the

1980’s, some economists spoke of a

(10)“productivity paradox”:  despite huge IT

investments, most notably in the service

sectors, productivity stagnated.  In the

retail industry, for example, in which IT

had been widely adopted during the

(15)1980’s, productivity (average output per

hour) rose at an average annual rate of

1.1 percent between 1973 and 1989, com-

pared with 2.4 percent in the preceding

25-year period.  roponents of IT argued

(20)that it takes both time and a critical mass

of investment for IT to yield benefits, and

some suggested that growth figures for

the 1990’s proved these benefits were

finally being realized.  They also argued

(25)that measures of productivity ignore what

would have happened without investments

in IT—productivity gains might have been

even lower.  There were even claims that

IT had improved the performance of the

(30)service sector significantly, although mac-

roeconomic measures of productivity did

not reflect the improvement.

     But some observers questioned why,

if IT had conferred economic value, it did

(35)not produce direct competitive advantages

for individual firms.  Resource-based

theory offers an answer, asserting that,

in general, firms gain competitive advan-

tages by accumulating resources that are

(40)economically valuable, relatively scarce,

and not easily replicated.  According to

a recent study of retail firms, which con-

firmed that IT has become pervasive

and relatively easy to acquire, IT by

(45)itself appeared to have conferred little

advantage.  In fact, though little evidence

of any direct effect was found, the fre-

quent negative correlations between IT

and performance suggested that IT had

(50)probably weakened some firms’ compet-

itive positions.  However, firms’ human

resources, in and of themselves, did

explain improved performance, and

some firms gained IT-related advan-

(55)tages by merging IT with complementary

resources, particularly human resources.

The findings support the notion, founded

in resource-based theory, that competi-

tive advantages do not arise from easily

(60)replicated resources, no matter how

impressive or economically valuable

they may be, but from complex, intan-

gible resources.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GWD-5-Q22:
The passage is primarily concerned with



A. describing a resource and indicating various methods used to study it

B. presenting a theory and offering an opposing point of view

C. providing an explanation for unexpected findings

D. demonstrating why a particular theory is unfounded

E. resolving a disagreement regarding the uses of a technology



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GWD-5-Q23:
The passage suggests that proponents of resource-based theory would be likely to explain IT’s inability to produce direct competitive advantages for individual firms by pointing out that



A. IT is not a resource that is difficult to obtain

B. IT is not an economically valuable resource

C. IT is a complex, intangible resource

D. economic progress has resulted from IT only in the service sector

E. changes brought about by IT cannot be detected by macroeconomic measures



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GWD-5-Q24:
The author of the passage discusses productivity in the retail industry in the first paragraph primarily in order to



A. suggest a way in which IT can be used to create a competitive advantage

B. provide an illustration of the “productivity paradox”

C. emphasize the practical value of the introduction of IT

D. cite an industry in which productivity did not stagnate during the 1980’s

E. counter the argument that IT could potentially create competitive advantage



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GWD-5-Q25:
According to the passage, most pre-1990 literature on businesses’ use of IT included which of the following?



A. Recommendations regarding effective ways to use IT to gain competitive advantage

B. Explanations of the advantages and disadvantages of adopting IT

C. Information about ways in which IT combined with human resources could be used to increase competitive advantage

D. A warning regarding the negative effect on competitive advantage that would occur if IT were not adopted

E. A belief in the likelihood of increased competitive advantage for firms using IT

答案：CABE

忽然忘了解脱

第四篇？~~~

    32.     计算机产业发展.
80-85成上升态势, 85-90下降, 原因是计算机生产厂商忽略实际用户的需要, 产品"too powerful"但"utility"不足. 作者建议厂商对此有针对缘髡? 最后举例"company I"(正面)和"company II"(反面)对比支持其观点. -- 这篇记得是GWD中的, 大家可以找找看.
    
P1 IT行业，开始时硬件的发展缓慢限制了行业发展，到1980-1985年，硬件大发展，价格下降，因计算机utilization上升，销量上升，总利润和销售上升  （有题），P2 90年后硬件过度发展，但utilization到顶了，销售额下降，利润下降。P3 提出观点，计算机公司应弥补技术和应用之间的gap （有题）   4 举了2个公司做例子，I弥补了gap，II技术先进  （有题），市场份额却小，因为软件只能应用于自己生产的电脑，I却能广泛应用。II要改进应用

两个~~~哪个？

lmiltamy

會不會太幸運了,遇到4個jj rc

oNshOt

感谢LZ分享！

abjure

LZ，休息两天先。。。

manna

哎，可是问题是，俺的SC。。。。。。。。。。。。