12月9日上午，近乎全裸，730 M50, V38

Taken

又考了个鸡肋分数。。。

本来打算冲刺760+的，结果突然换题。。时也？命也！被老婆打击：你就这水平了...

先罗唆一下交通和停车情况，给开车的同学做参考

早上7:50从三元桥出发，8:20已经停好车了。停车费地上4块/小时，我到的时候车位充足。没地方就停地库吧，5块/小时。

数学狗在附件里里

语文狗

阅读：
1，女权运动那篇

好像有人考古出来了，我没看。有的同学可以发给我，我确认一下

2，美国资本市场

先讲美国的external capital market的作用。讲了美国投资人和德国投资人的区别。美国投资人不深入了解企业的运营情况，仅仅根据数据，比如利润率现金流，一类的东西决定投资。德国投资人正相反，他们仅投资很少的公司，并且了解的企业的运营情况，根据自己掌握的情况来决定投资。然后讲美国投资人的那种做法不好，因为影响企业高层的决定，比如追逐短期利润目标等

第二段讲美国的internal capital market。blahblah讲了一堆，反正还是说不好。

这篇好像在哪看到过，不确定。

逻辑

1，狗粮涨价
说某国的宠物市场萎缩。通常情况下，市场萎缩会导致业内企业降价，通过打价格战把竞争对手挤出去。但是在宠物市场萎缩的情况下，做狗粮的公司不仅没把狗粮降价，反而提价了，还说新狗粮的质量好。
问解释
现在养狗的都养名种来彰显身份和地位，不差钱

2，伐木
一个政府说我们规定，以后伐木公司运木头都必须用直升机运，不能再用卡车运了。因为用卡车运需要修路，破坏环境。我们这么规定，是为了保护环境。
问削弱
我选用直升机运输，需要把待砍的树（用了the tree）周围清空，好让直升机降落

作文狗

AA: 房价在过去的5年翻番，但是股票的价格却在下降。在未来的5年内，房价还会翻番，所以现在是买房的最好时机
AI: 技术和需求的改变会让很多人丢工作。这些人(individual worker)自己，而不是政府或者企业，应该承担起适应转变的责任

其他的暂时想不起来了

lively926

楼主已经很牛啦····· 谢谢提供jj    
恭喜  很牛的成绩···！！！

九天仙女

730很高了~忘记哪次看GWD的高分学员的视频，说，750+很大是运气

zhongyaya

谢谢楼主的JJ

AllenZX

第一个逻辑确认
第二个逻辑存疑 如果说政府有其他intention会更好点.  如果清空仍是比修路少砍点树,那还是不足以削弱结论.

Taken

第二题选项不清晰
有说伐木公司现在只有卡车，没有直升机的
有说伐木修的路会用来运其他货物
还有2个记不清楚了

我逻辑一直是弱项，大家的讨论

AllenZX

这两个更不像... -.-..   再想想. 还有啥.  没有就清空这答案了.

shanghaigo

祝贺啊！730相当高了！lz是实力派！鉴定完毕！

genius_fang

顶楼主！！！

mozhiyu

Recent feminist scholarship con-
    cerning the United States in the 1920’s
    challenges earlier interpretations that
Line    assessed the twenties in terms of the
 (5)    unkept “promises” of the women’s
suffrage movement.  This new scholar-
ship disputes the long-held view that
because a women’s voting bloc did not
materialize after women gained the right
(10)    to vote in 1920, suffrage failed to
produce long-term political gains for
women.  These feminist scholars also
challenge the old view that pronounced
suffrage a failure for not delivering on
(15)    the promise that the women’s vote
would bring about moral, corruption-
free governance.  Asked whether
women’s suffrage was a failure, these
scholars cite the words of turn-of-the-
(20)    century social reformer Jane Addams,
    “Why don’t you ask if suffrage in
    general is failing?”学者的观点认为suffrage是失败
     In some ways, however, these递进
scholars still present the 1920’s as a
(25)    period of decline.  After suffrage, they
argue, the feminist movement lost its
cohesiveness, and gender conscious-
ness waned.  After the mid-1920’s, few
successes could be claimed by fem-
(30)    inist reformers: little could be seen in
the way of legislative victories. 衰退的年代 new scholarship的另一观点
     During this decade, however, there
    was intense activism aimed at achiev-
ing increased autonomy for women,
(35)     broadening the spheres within which
they lived their daily lives.  Women’s
organizations worked to establish
opportunities for women: they strove to
    secure for women the full entitlements
(40)    of citizenship, including the right to hold
office and the right to serve on juries.最终观点 不同意recent的观点
老新观点
逻辑简图：
1P: recent scholarship challenges earlier interpretations unkept “promise” of women suffrage. Disputes, also challenges older view…
2P: in some ways, however, decline….
3P: during this decade, however, intense activism…. Women’ organization worked to establish opportunities for women…
Prep
The identification of femininity with morality and a belief in the innate moral superiority of women were fundamental to the cult of female domesticity in the nineteenth-century United States.  Ironically, this ideology of female benevolence empowered women in the realm of social activism, enabling them to escape the confines of their traditional domestic spheres and to enter prisons, hospitals, battlefields, and slums.  By following this path, some women came to wield considerable authority in the distribution of resources and services in their communities.

The sentimentalized concept of female benevolence bore little resemblance to women's actual work, which was decidedly unsentimental and businesslike, in that it involved chartering societies, raising money, and paying salaries.  Moreover, in the face of legal limitations on their right to control money and property, women had to find ingenious legal ways to run and finance organized philanthropy.  In contrast to the day-to-day reality of this work, the idealized image of female benevolence lent a sentimental and gracious aura of altruism to the very real authority and privilege that some women commanded--which explains why some women activists clung tenaciously to this ideology.  But clinging to this ideology also prevented these women from even attempting to gain true political power because it implied a moral purity that precluded participation in the messy world of partisan politics.