- UID
- 779686
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-7-11
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
2. Barnes: The two newest employees at this company have salaries that are too high for the simple tasks normally assigned to new employees and duties that are too complex for inexperienced workers. Hence, the salaries and the complexity of the duties of these two newest employees should be reduced.
The leap in the logic chain is that the two newest employees are inexperienced. Which one of the following is an assumption on which Barnes’s argument depends? (A) The duties of the two newest employees are not less complex than any others in the company.
From the argument, we can see that the duties of the two employees are too complex for inexperienced workers. So this answer is useless. (B) It is because of the complex duties assigned that the two newest employees are being paid more than is usually paid to newly hired employees.
We do not know why their wages are higher than those of newly hired employees, but, from the conclusion, we know that their wages should be lower. (C) The two newest employees are not experienced at their occupations.
If we use the negation, we can find that the conclusion cannot stand. On the other hand, because they are not experienced, their wages should be reduced. BA (D) Barnes was not hired at a higher-than-average starting salary.
But we can see that their wages are too high for newly hired employees. (E) The salaries of the two newest employees are no higher than the salaries that other companies pay for workers with a similar level of experience. We do not know how other companies pay their newly hired employees, but the argument reveals that the wages for the two employees are too high, and should be reduced.
65. (34047-!-item-!-188;#058&007611)
Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.尤其注意,这里指的是对于高血压的预防性治疗,而不是阻止高血压治疗 Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above? (A) The many fatal strokes and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.
In this case, we can figure out that the preventive treatment for hypertension indeed has economic justification. BA (B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.
The answer choice strengthens the argument by showing that the benefit of the preventive treatment is insignificant. (C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.
It seems to weaken the argument, but a more thorough reveals that the conclusion is related to the economic justification, while the answer is related to health care. Even though the economic considerations should not be dominant, it still can be very important. (D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.
This answer choice points out the disadvantage of the prevention treatment, thus strengthening the argument. (E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind. This answer reveals that the benefit of the measures is smaller than the cost, thus strengthening the argument.
66. (34095-!-item-!-188;#058&007612) The sustained massive use of pesticides in farming has two effects that are especially pernicious. First, it often kills off the pests' natural enemies in the area. Second, it often unintentionally gives rise to insecticide-resistant pests, since those insects that survive a particular insecticide will be the ones most resistant to it, and they are the ones left to breed. From the passage above, it can be properly inferred that the effectiveness of the sustained massive use of pesticides can be extended by doing which of the following, assuming that each is a realistic possibility? 注意问题问的是如何能够使得杀虫剂的效用更好的发挥 (A) Using only chemically stable insecticides
Its problem has been referred in the argument, a problem that those insects that survive a particular insecticide will be the ones most resistant to the stable insecticide. (B) Periodically switching the type of insecticide used
Yes, in this case, those insects, most resistant to one insecticide, cannot quickly become resistant to other insecticides, thus making the effectiveness of the pesticides can be extended. BA (C) Gradually increasing the quantities of pesticides used
From the beginning of the argument, we can see “The sustained massive use of pesticides”. So this answer choice will still have the problems above. (D) Leaving a few fields fallow every year
Fallow may make products increase, while it may not make sure the effectiveness of pesticides. (E) Breeding higher-yielding varieties of crop plants Higher-yielding cannot solve the problems.
67. (34143-!-item-!-188;#058&007613) Transnational cooperation among corporations is experiencing a modest renaissance among United States firms, even though projects undertaken by two or more corporations under a collaborative agreement are less profitable than projects undertaken by a single corporation. The advantage of transnational cooperation is that such joint international projects may allow United States firms to win foreign contracts that they would not otherwise be able to win. Which of the following is information provided by the passage?
这个问题要求一下哪个选项能从原文推出来 (A) Transnational cooperation involves projects too big for a single corporation to handle.
If so, it weakens the argument. Because it is opposite to the information that projects undertaken by two or more corporations under a collaborative agreement are less profitable than projects undertaken by a single corporation. (B) Transnational cooperation results in a pooling of resources leading to high-quality performance.
Yes, it points out the benefit of transnational cooperation. BA
高质量的表现不一定就能成功,而且也间接假设:其他的公司就没有高质量的表现 (C) Transnational cooperation has in the past been both more common and less common than it is now among United States firms.
We cannot infer this from the argument.
说实话,我只是扫了一眼C,感觉没什么关系,就排除了。没有仔细读!第一句的renaissance(复兴:表示过去很成功,但是后来又不行了,是一升一降的过程)是关键,这么大段话,结果出题点就在一个单词这里,很tricky!
first, the word “renaissance” (rebirth) implies that transnational cooperation is now on the rise, after previously having a lower level. so that takes care of the “lower in the past” part of the correct answer.
second, the renaissance is described as “modest”. the only way this description would be reasonable is if transnational cooperation has not re-achieved its previous levels; there's the “higher in the past” part.From Manhattan (D) Joint projects between United States and foreign corporations are not profitable enough to be worth undertaking.
Actually, these projects are profitable, but without transnational cooperation, United firms cannot win.
之前想选D来着,但是还是觉得有问题,不是没有足够的利润,而是不能成功获得(吃不到葡萄,说葡萄酸) (E) Joint projects between United States and foreign corporations benefit only those who commission the projects. “Commission the projects” is not referred.
68. (34191-!-item-!-188;#058&007616) Leaders of a miners' union on strike against Coalco are contemplating additional measures to pressure the company to accept the union's contract proposal. The union leaders are considering as their principal new tactic a consumer boycott against Gasco gas stations, which are owned by Energy Incorporated, the same corporation that owns Coalco. The answer to which of the following questions is LEAST directly revelant to the union leaders' consideration of whether attempting a boycott of Gasco will lead to acceptance of their contract proposal? (A) Would revenue losses by Gasco seriously affect Energy Incorporated?
Yes, if so, Energy Incorporated will notice the problem, and talk with the leaders of the miner’s union. (B) Can current Gasco customers easily obtain gasoline elsewhere?
Yes, if so, customers can get gasoline from other places, and the strike is insignificant. (C) Have other miners' unions won contracts similar to the one proposed by this union?
Yes, if so, it is a successful experience for the leaders. (D) Have other unions that have employed a similar tactic achieved their goals with it?
Yes, if so, the leaders can learn from the precursor. (E) Do other corporations that own coal companies also own gas stations?
This situation is so unique that it cannot help the union leaders to success. BA
|
|