- UID
- 635274
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-5-28
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
1.background information:Contemporary business firms need to recognize that avoiding social responsibility leads to the gradual erosion of power. “In the long run, those who do not use power in a manner which society considers responsible will tend to lose it.” The law’s application to human institutions certainly stands confirmed by history. premise: Though the “long run” may require decades or even centuries in some instances, society ultimately acts to reduce power when society thinks it is not being used responsibly. conclusion: a business that wishes to retain its power as long as it can must act responsibly. the erosion of power & the lost of the power (A) Government institutions are as subject to the Iron Law of Responsibility as business institutions. --support (B) Public relations programs can cause society to consider an institution socially responsible even when it is not. --public relations programs--irrelevant--right (C) The power of some institutions erodes more slowly than the power of others, whether they are socially responsible or not. --some institutions--what institutions?--maybe it has effect on the conclusion, maybe not (D) Since no institution is eternal, every business will eventually fail. --irrelevant (E) Some businesses that have used power in socially responsible ways have lost it. --weaken--right 又错了~~~思路完全错误 society ultimately acts to reduce power when society thinks it is not being used responsibly
retain power & wish to retain power 2.background information:United States manufacturers currently produce most of the world's solar-power generators--most of which are exported to Europe. However, European manufacturers are emerging and probably will ultimately capture much of the European market. The United States government is funding initiatives intended to encourage use of solar power within the United States. premise: If these initiatives succeed in increasing the demand for solar-power generators in the United States, ??? conclusion:United States manufacturers will probably maintain significant production levels, there are more Americans than Europeans using solar-power generators~when less Europeans use the American made generators, more Americans do. (A) some United States manufacturers have been substantially increasing their output over the last several years --the output in the past is irrelevant (B) the efficiency of solar-power generators in converting energy from the Sun into electric power is not improving as fast as it once did --the efficiency of generators is irrelevant (C) just as European manufacturers enjoy certain competitive advantages in Europe, so do United States manufacturers in the United States --the market is big, and competitors are not as competitive as those in the US--right (D) European governments are currently undertaking initiatives to stimulate the use of solar power within Europe --the question is about the demand in the US, not about it in Europe--irrelevant (E) the current market for solar-power generators in the United States is very limited
--the initiatives have already succeeded in increasing the demand--irrelevant 3.background information:The higher the level of certain vitamins and minerals in the bloodstream, the better a person's lung function, as measured by the amount of air the person can expel in one second. The lung function of smokers is significantly worse, on average, than that of nonsmokers. premise:??? + increase their intake of foods that are rich in these helpful vitamins and minerals. conclusion:smokers improve their lung function can the smokers absorb the vitamins and minerals as much as they eat~ (A) Smokers are less likely than nonsmokers to have diets that are rich in vitamins and minerals. --weaken (B) The lung function of smokers whose diets are rich in those vitamins and minerals is generally better than that of nonsmokers with comparable diets. --support (C) People whose diets are deficient in those vitamins and minerals do not typically have other health problems in addition to diminished lung function. --other health problems are irrelevant (D) Stopping smoking will not typically improve lung function more than any diet changes can. --stop smoking is irrelevant (E) Smoking does not introduce into the body chemicals that prevent the helpful vitamins and minerals from entering the bloodstream. --right 4.background information:Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter's atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were. In hopes of gaining some indication of the fragments' size, astronomers studied spectrographic analyses of Jupiter's outer atmosphere. These analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur after the fragments' entry. The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but many astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter's outer atmosphere does contain sulfur. opposing viewpoints:Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter's atmosphere in 1994 premise: sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer conclusion: some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter's outer atmosphere without being burned up. (A) The first presents a circumstance for which the astronomer offers an explanation; the second is part of that explanation. --the second is not part of the astronomer's explanation (B) The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion. --right (C) The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that conclusion. --the second is not evidence. (D) The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that conclusion. --the first is not evidence, and it doesn't support the conclusion. (E) The first is a judgment advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion. --the first is truth, not a judgment--right 错了~~~ B--the first doesn't weigh against the conclusion~in fact, the sulfur has nothing to do with the conclusion 5. Which of the following would it be most useful to determine in evaluating the argument?
premise:Most of the world's supply of uranium currently comes from mines. It is possible to extract uranium from seawater, but the cost of doing so is greater than the price that uranium fetches on the world market. conclusion:Therefore, until the cost of extracting uranium from seawater can somehow be reduced, this method of obtaining uranium is unlikely to be commercially viable. maybe some day the costs to extract uranium from mines increases~higher than those from seawater~ (A) Whether the uranium in deposits on land is rapidly being depleted --if the uranium on land is being depleted, the cost is unnecessary--right (B) Whether most uranium is used near where it is mined --the fee for transportation is irrelevant (C) Whether there are any technological advances that show promise of reducing the cost of extracting uranium from seawater --irrelevant (D) Whether the total amount of uranium in seawater is significantly greater than the total amount of uranium on land --the amount of uranium is irrelevant--the question is about the cost (E) Whether uranium can be extracted from freshwater at a cost similar to the cost of extracting it from seawater --the freshwater is irrelevant |
|