- UID
- 568455
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-9-24
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
9-7 好吧,我也尝试英文 1. 55s Current legislation that requires designated sections for smokers and nonsmokers on the premises of privately owned businesses is an intrusion into the private sector that cannot be justified. The fact that studies indicate that nonsmokers might be harmed by inhaling the smoke from others’ cigarettes is not the main issue. Rather, the main issue concerns the government’s violation of the right of private businesses to determine their own policies and rules. Which of the following is a principle that, if accepted, could enable the conclusion to be properly drawn?
Premise: nonsmokers and smokers should divide in office sector. Conclusion: this is unfair. Not because health problem, but because violate the rule that workers have own right to choose work place.
Assumption: divide office sector means workers have no right to choose work place they like.
A. Government intrusion into the policies and rules of private businesses is justified only when individuals might be harmed. B. The right of individuals to breathe safe air supersedes the right of businesses to be free from government intrusion. C. The right of businesses to self-determination overrides whatever right or duty the government may have to protect the individual. D. It is the duty of private businesses to protect employees from harm in the workplace. E. Where the rights of businesses and the duty of government conflict, the main issue is finding a successful compromise. Answer: C gap
2. 25s A survey was recently conducted among ferry passengers on the North Sea. Among the results was this: more of those who had taken anti-seasickness medication before their trip reported symptoms of seasickness than those who had not taken such medication. It is clear, then, that despite claims by drug companies that clinical tests show the contrary, people would be better off not taking anti-seasickness medications. Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?
Premise: someone who has taken anti-seasickness drug is more likely to be seasick that that who does not take such drug. Conclusion: people’d better not take such drug.
Weak: that is because someone who likely to be seasick is more inclined to take such drug.
A. Given rough enough weather, most ferry passengers will have some symptoms of seasickness. B. The clinical tests reported by the drug companies were conducted by the drug companies’ staffs. C. People who do not take anti-seasickness medication are just as likely to respond to a survey on seasickness as people who do. D. The seasickness symptoms of the people who took anti-seasickness medication would have been more severe had they not taken the medication. E. People who have spent money on anti-seasickness medication are less likely to admit symptoms of seasickness than those who have not. Answer: D bolster the premise
3. 65s Advertisement: Clark brand-name parts are made for cars manufactured in this country. They satisfy all of our government automotive tests-the toughest such tests in the world. With foreign-made parts, you never know which might be reliable and which are cheap look-alikes that are poorly constructed and liable to cost you hundreds of dollars in repairs. Therefore, be smart and insist on brand-name parts by Clark for your car. The argument requires the assumption that
Premise: C brand car match the standard in this country. By contract, foreign cars are cheap look-alikes, thus more likely to be repaired. Conclusion: people should buy C brand cars.
Assumption: match the standard will less likely to be repaired.
A. Clark parts are available only in this country B. foreign-made arts are not suitable for cars manufactured in this country C. no foreign-made parts satisfy our government standards D. parts that satisfy or government standards are not as poorly constructed as cheap foreign made parts E. if parts are made for cars manufactured in our country, they are not poorly constructed Answer: D C看起来和文章的逻辑不相关吧。文章就是说了是因为国外的质量不好(A),所以得出了be smart and insist on brand-name parts by Clark for your car(B). 要建立这两者之间的关系,这个C无关.. C似乎只是再次说明了A的内容。而没有建立起AB之间的关系。 c no foreign-made parts satisfy our government standards 取非 :not any satisfy到some might satisfy取非不是外国的“都”满足标准,而是some 可能满足标准。所以结果和文中的论据一样,still unknown whether it is poorly constructed;不能说明结论“用本国的是明智选择”一定错
4. 45s Despite improvements in treatment for asthma, the death rate from this disease has doubled during the past decade from its previous rate. Two possible explanations for this increase have been offered. First, the recording of deaths due to asthma has become more widespread and accurate in the past decade than it had been previously. Second, there has been an increase in urban pollution. However, since the rate of deaths due to asthma has increased dramatically even in cities with long-standing, comprehensive medical records and with little or no urban pollution, one must instead conclude that the cause of increased deaths is the use of bronchial inhalers by asthma sufferers to relieve their symptoms. Each of the following, if true, provides support to the argument EXCEPT:
Premise: the record death from asthma has greatly increased during the past several years. There are 2 reasons. 1, the record is more accurate and widespread. 2. Air pollution. Conclusion: the inhaler is the real cause. Because even in some areas have record for a long time and litter pollution, the record death from asthma still increases.
Support except: for some place, people do not use inhaler, the record still increases.
A. Urban populations have doubled in the past decade. B. Records of asthma deaths are as accurate for the past twenty years as for the past ten years. C. Evidence suggests that inhalers make the lungs more sensitive to irritation by airborne pollen. D. By temporarily relieving the symptoms of asthma, inhalers encourage sufferers to avoid more beneficial measures. E. Ten years ago bronchial inhalers were not available as an asthma treatment. Answer: A weak
AA “We should not approve the business loan application of the local group that wants to open a franchise outlet for the Kool Kone chain of ice cream parlors. Frostbite is known for its cold winters, and cold weather can mean slow ice cream sales. For example, even though Frostbite is a town of 10,000 people, it has only one ice cream spot — the Frigid Cow. Despite the lack of competition, the Frigid Cow’s net revenues fell by 10 percent last winter.”
1. the threshold problem with this argument is that the author assumes that the cold winter will definitely lead poor sales of ice cream. 2. The second flaw that weakens the logic of this argument is that the author unfairly assumes that the earnings decline of Frigid Cow is on account of the cold winter. 3. his perspective that the franchise outlet for the Kool Kone chain will follow Frigid Cow’s failure is still ill-founded. |
|