TTGWD-4-14

hedge

Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument?

 

The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae to the composer Pescard (1400 – 1474) has been regarded as tentative, since it was based on a single treatise from the early 1500’s that named Pescard as the composer.  Recently, several musical treatises from the late 1500’s have come to light, all of which name Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae.  Unfortunately, these newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of Lacrimae to Pescard, since _______.

 

1. the treatise from the early 1500’s misidentifies the composers of some of the musical works it considers
2. the author of the treatise from the early 1500’s had no very strong evidence on which to base the identification of Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae
3. there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are not even mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500’s
4. the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier treatise
5. no known treatises from the 1600’s identify Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae

题目没怎么看懂,哪位牛牛说说题目和思路?

pengh

D

题目意思是把T这副作品归功于P作曲家是草率的，因为只有一篇在1500世纪早期的论文这么说，现在新发现几篇1500世纪后期的论文也这么说。但是并不能说现在的证据更有力，因为——

D 后面的论文可能只是引用前面的

就好像你在百度上搜东西，搜出了几十篇，但最后都是指向一篇。