og25/og141/0g152/og179/205，主要是关于with用法。

薰衣紫草

前面有逗号的分词可以修饰前面的名词, 也可以修饰前面句子.

smartcoco

谢谢薰衣紫草MM，总是拔刀相助，感激不尽哦

BTW,你的签名图片好pp哦

may耶

请教一下~~~

the participles that appear at first to refer to the immediately preceding noun, newcomers，rather than to Native Americans.

那是不是就说，没有指代不明，而是错在应该向前修饰？

是不是只要分词意思上是指代前一个名词的时候，即使把分词放在两个名词间都是可以的？

cmon

顶

当当84

以下是引用soaring在2005-1-24 22:05:00的发言：

og 25:

25：The end of the eighteenth century saw the emergence of prize-stock breeding, with individual bulls and cows receiving awards, fetching unprecedented prices, and exciting enormous interest whenever they were put on show.

这里with的用法作用和修饰对象？

表示伴随，前明说了emergence of prize-stock breeding，然后给各with结构所说它的内容，我是这样理解的

with 这里是一个独立主格结构， 表示伴随没有错，可以使with 可以为前文做进一步的解释吗？

当当84

顶！

autumn713

請問NN

152.
    When the technique known as gene-splicing was invented in the early 1970’s, it was feared that scientists might inadvertently create an “Andromeda strain,” a microbe never before seen on Earth that might escape from the laboratory and it would kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it.

(A) it would kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it

(B) it might kill vast numbers of humans with no natural defenses against it

(C) kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it

(D) kill vast numbers of humans who have no natural defenses against them（C）

(E) kill vast numbers of humans with no natural defenses against them

如果把with 後面加would那要加在哪裡?

ex: B:it might kill vast numbers of humans (would)with no natural defenses against it??

如果加了would就可以成為正確答案嗎?

之所以這樣子問 是因為with前面沒有逗號 因此怕會產生修飾主語的歧異

不知道大家認為呢?

先謝過

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-16 21:55:50编辑过]

KATIEUS

同问！

bloveecho

对于17楼的说法非常迷糊,不知提到的主语是指谁

with在这就作定语修饰humans

情态动词应该是根着实义动词来的,加在with前后算如何解法?

我想OG在这里的意思是说with在这里做定语修饰的方式不好,不好的原因就是因为它没有表达出conditional的语气!