prep193. (T-3-Q2)关于E选项with的用法，谢谢！

geyh163

因为搜了很多帖子都没有具体回答这个困惑的，所以特此发帖子想请各位NN帮忙解答一下困惑！谢谢！！！
As the honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed, staying where it is inserted, this results in the act of stinging causing the bee to sustain a fatal injury.

A.       As the honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed, staying where it is inserted, this results in the act of stinging causing

B.       As the heavily barbed stinger of the honeybee stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes

C.       The honeybee’s stinger, heavily barbed and staying where it is inserted, results in the fact that the act of stinging causes

D.       The heavily barbed stinger of the honeybee stays where it is inserted, and results in the act of stinging causing         

E.        The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes
答案是E。但是对于E中with the result that 的用法我很困惑，就如下面190这道题，with +n +定语从句是作为定语来使用，错误的修饰前面的charge。那在这个E选项中，with the result that 前面也没有合适的名词可以修饰啊，那它是作为副词表示结果吗？
我看到PREP笔记上有这个注释：
独立主格并不包括“with + n. + 定语从句”和“n. + 定语从句”的形式，这个形式做的是非限定性修饰前面名词的定语，因为这个形式就相当于n, with + n.，或者是n., n. + that概括性同位语。
当时做这道题的时候在C和E中徘徊，然后想到with+n+定从是作定语，我又觉得前面没有可修饰的名词，所以就排除了E选的C。
现在来看C是肯定不对的，stinger不能直接result in，
但是还是对E选项很困惑。。。。以后遇到with+n+定从 的结构到底应该怎么思考呢？
有没有NN来帮忙解释一下！！万分感谢！！

prep-190

Until the passage of the Piracy and Counterfeiting Amendments Act in 1982, a first-time charge of copyright infringement was merely a misdemeanor charge, federal prosecutors being unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright infringers, while offenders were subject to relatively small penalties.

A.       charge, federal prosecutors being unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright infringers, while offenders were

B.       charge, with federal prosecutors who were unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers, offenders being

C.       charge, federal prosecutors unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers, while offenders were

D.       charge; therefore, federal prosecutors were unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright infringers and offenders being   (E)

E.        charge; therefore, federal prosecutors were unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers, and offenders were

PREP笔记中对于B的解释：    B选项中，with federal prosecutors who were是定语结构，非限定性修饰就近的名词a misdemeanor charge，逻辑不符；being多余；句式不好，独立主格修饰介词短语里面的从句，awkward；而且割裂了were unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers, offenders being subject to relatively small penalties与主句的关系。

geyh163

没有人么T_T。。。。。。。。。。。。。

gavinkkk

瞎猜一个
我感觉是伴随状语，然后里面有个that引导的从句，这个that引导的从句不知道算是修饰result的定语还是就是result的同位语..

geyh163

gavinkkk 发表于 2013-8-7 15:40
瞎猜一个
我感觉是伴随状语，然后里面有个that引导的从句，这个that引导的从句不知道算是修饰result的定语 ...

不知道。。。好混乱T_T

soulwangh

with + n + 定语从句 算是介词短语的一种
在Manhattan中 介词短语既可以做名词的修饰词也可以做动词修饰词。也就是说既可以做定语也可以做状语。
所以同意伴随状语的说法。

penguinvino

第一题中的with the result that是一个固定用法吧，好像不是with引导的独立主格吧。。。。求轻拍。。。