Duke Fuqua vs. Cambridge Judge

38383388

这很好解释。欧洲只有2个国家说英语，且大部分不是移民国家。

另外你要了解，大部分中国移民的工作都比较低端，当个小会计小网管混吃混合混移民监的是大多数。英国本来就小，支柱产业就是伦敦一圈的第三产业和高精尖工业，不像美国能提供这么多可供中国移民栖息的岗位。

dizzyboy

Congrats on the admits!

The general rule is that go to school in the region where you want to get a job.

I will speak for a Fuqua perspective.

Fuqua is very strong in consulting and general management. For general management, it is harder to get into for international student because of visa issues; however, there are a few that will sponsor you, especially if you want to go back to Asia in the long term. Most consulting firm sponsors visa; however, getting a green card is a long process, and consulting is a hard lifestyle with up-or-out policy, so I’m not sure how many end up getting a green card through consulting.

The two major employment opportunities for Fuqua grads in HK are consulting and banking. The general feeling is that for Chinese students, placement in HK is much easier than it is for US. You can do GM in HK, but it may take some networking.

I heard that an added benefit of 2 year MBA versus 18 month MBA is the ability to switch careers. Since 2 year MBA programs (at least in the US) have a very robust internship tradition, which allows companies to try out future hires. This is more of an issue if you are going from GM to consulting than from consulting to GM (unless you are switching industry as well).

Good luck!

-- by 会员 asimov1 (2013/3/7 22:59:43)

感谢前辈的insides!

tehical

回国混绝对剑桥

holdieliel

楼主选cambridge吧...

snowyangel

楼主选cambridge吧...

-- by 会员 holdieliel (2013/3/10 16:32:24)

为什么这么说? 很想知道

holdieliel

楼主选cambridge吧...

-- by 会员 holdieliel (2013/3/10 16:32:24)

为什么这么说? 很想知道

-- by 会员 snowyangel (2013/3/11 20:57:51)

留Duke的坑出来给其他人.......

gina2012

这很好解释。欧洲只有2个国家说英语，且大部分不是移民国家。

另外你要了解，大部分中国移民的工作都比较低端，当个小会计小网管混吃混合混移民监的是大多数。英国本来就小，支柱产业就是伦敦一圈的第三产业和高精尖工业，不像美国能提供这么多可供中国移民栖息的岗位。

-- by 会员 38383388 (2013/3/8 19:19:13)

我狭隘推论一下,言外之意在英国混得都是混吃混喝的小会计小网管? 美国的华人做的
都是外业高管，金融操盘手

哈哈

asimov1

But Europe has much better social welfare, despite some countries going down hill.

If you do not want become some super director, Europe is less competitive, easier life.
-- by 会员 gina2012 (2013/3/8 17:57:21)

I would say that most US corporate jobs are not stressful, and you get decent benefits. The work/life balance and pressure come if you are ambitious and want to climb the corporate ladder. This ambition is also what drives people to go to top-tier b-schools, which LZ is deciding on. If LZ wanted to settle on a middle management role at end of his/her career, s/he could have applied to a lower-tier school, and probably gotten a full scholarship.

gina2012

But Europe has much better social welfare, despite some countries going down hill.

If you do not want become some super director, Europe is less competitive, easier life.
-- by 会员 gina2012 (2013/3/8 17:57:21)

I would say that most US corporate jobs are not stressful, and you get decent benefits. The work/life balance and pressure come if you are ambitious and want to climb the corporate ladder. This ambition is also what drives people to go to top-tier b-schools, which LZ is deciding on. If LZ wanted to settle on a middle management role at end of his/her career, s/he could have applied to a lower-tier school, and probably gotten a full scholarship.

-- by 会员 asimov1 (2013/3/12 5:08:42)

其实到了后来你会发现做到director level跟mba真的没多大关系。

我觉得直接效果也就中高层管理者。

不过说这两个学校，我的点是比较国家和区域的不同，不是中高层和顶层的差别。哈佛出来不保你成总裁。
话说差点的学校出来不一定做不了总裁。再说剑桥也不是很差。不是读了个top15之外的就意味着你没了野心，没了top的职业生涯。

我不在美国，不了解美国，我的朋友都说美国竞争满激烈的。 美国医保是自己出钱的，美国辞职走人也是更经常。其实我也很想去美国
看看，就是吃不了苦，呵呵。

oleoh

不懂美国就多懂点，再出来指点江山吧。。看不下去

But Europe has much better social welfare, despite some countries going down hill.

If you do not want become some super director, Europe is less competitive, easier life.
-- by 会员 gina2012 (2013/3/8 17:57:21)

I would say that most US corporate jobs are not stressful, and you get decent benefits. The work/life balance and pressure come if you are ambitious and want to climb the corporate ladder. This ambition is also what drives people to go to top-tier b-schools, which LZ is deciding on. If LZ wanted to settle on a middle management role at end of his/her career, s/he could have applied to a lower-tier school, and probably gotten a full scholarship.

-- by 会员 asimov1 (2013/3/12 5:08:42)

其实到了后来你会发现做到director level跟mba真的没多大关系。

我觉得直接效果也就中高层管理者。

不过说这两个学校，我的点是比较国家和区域的不同，不是中高层和顶层的差别。哈佛出来不保你成总裁。
话说差点的学校出来不一定做不了总裁。再说剑桥也不是很差。不是读了个top15之外的就意味着你没了野心，没了top的职业生涯。

我不在美国，不了解美国，我的朋友都说美国竞争满激烈的。 美国医保是自己出钱的，美国辞职走人也是更经常。其实我也很想去美国
看看，就是吃不了苦，呵呵。

-- by 会员 gina2012 (2013/3/12 5:37:13)