ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5589|回复: 6

A recent national study of the public schools shows that there is now one microc

[复制链接]
发表于 2011-7-14 17:03:21 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
请问这里为什么用的是were。而不是was呢
发表于 2011-8-18 12:49:36 | 显示全部楼层
同不懂~up
发表于 2011-8-18 18:10:48 | 显示全部楼层
同不懂~up
发表于 2011-8-18 19:18:42 | 显示全部楼层
关键是有含was的选项么?
were/was在这句话里强调一个过去时态。
lz能否把原题贴上来看看。。
发表于 2015-11-7 03:47:07 | 显示全部楼层
这道题还是没有搞懂。大牛能不能来解释一下。为什么要用four times as many as there were. 这个were后面代表着什么,if it represents "one microPC for every 32 students", then it should be was instead of were不是吗?求解求解


og-89.   A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago.



(A) there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were



(B) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were



(C) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were



(D) every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were
发表于 2019-3-20 17:25:46 | 显示全部楼层
像个孩子 发表于 2015-11-7 03:47
这道题还是没有搞懂。大牛能不能来解释一下。为什么要用four times as many as there were. 这个were后面代 ...

这里应该是比较结构要前后平行的问题吧。A recent national study of the public schools shows that there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were (computers) four years ago.
这个句子里面是microcomputer 和 computer(或microcomputer,反正是同类事物)比较。但是如果是DE的话,就变成了microcomputer 和 four years ago 比较。
这个是我个人理解,如果大家觉得这种理解有问题麻烦帮忙指出来啦!谢谢!
发表于 2019-3-23 09:45:52 | 显示全部楼层
因为是many所以要用were吧?还是不懂E为什么不对,不可以理解成比较has后的宾语吗?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-3-28 22:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部