Prep上的一道关于

mongmong

A deal 可以做概括性同位语修饰前面整个句子的哦，就是前面说的它买下了其他公司的这样一个概念，用a deal来做这个句子的同位语哦

-- by 会员 Joseph_lin (2011/5/23 16:15:42)

哎，我不懂了哎，等待ＮＮ吧
可是为啥加了part of 就不行呢？　且ＯＧ上说的是the appositive phrase (a part...) must have a noun or noun phrase as a clear antecedent.
求救！！

mongmong

ding

mongmong

ding

Joseph_lin

DING

mongmong

ding

ALGT

这个题我也做错了，想当然的认为是同位语，因为句子读下来感觉意思很通。

看过答案之后仔细看了关于同位语的规则，
楼上mongmong兄也说到：ＯＧ上说的是the appositive phrase (a part...) must have a noun or noun phrase as a clear antecedent.
另外白勇语法也提到说同位语一般修饰名词或名词短语，

而这个part of deal解释说明的内容，我理解是这个purchase的部分，但是这个purchase在原句中是动词，因此这里就不是同位语了。。。

如果这样非要说是同位语，那么解释的所谓的先行词不管是哪部分，逻辑上都是说不通的了

愚见

ALGT

或者可不可以这样理解，如是修饰前面的整句内容，根据语法解释，应该是“概括性解释”，但part of a deal并不具有这一功能。。因此也不是一个合理的同位语结构

universer

同问 prep107就没有先行词

The majority of students entering law school this fall are expected to be women, a trend that will ultimately place more women in leadership positions in politics and business.

150就不行呢 这个收购是交易的一部分不行吗

guoqi

顶  希望ＮＮ解答啊

johnson1120

我也有这个疑惑 做这道的时候错了 当时选的A 语法笔记里说a part找不到可以修饰的词 所以没有同位语
但有一条和这道非常像：


164.    (33751-!-item-!-188;#058&007036)


One automobile manufacturer has announced plans to increase the average fuel efficiency of its sport utility vehicles by 25 percent over the next five years, amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, and representing the first significant change in the fuel efficiency of any class of passenger vehicle in almost two decades.


(A) amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, and representing
(B) amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, and it would represent
(C) an increase that would amount to roughly five miles per gallon and it would represent
(D) an increase that would amount to roughly five miles per gallon and would represent
(E) which is an increase amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, representing
这一道正确答案就是D.
按照之前语法笔记的解释，an increase在前面句中也找不到先行词啊(语法笔记中对此处an increase的解释就是概括性同位语)
有大牛出来解释下么？