ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1601|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

《语法大全》第三部分 补充250题的第66题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-23 12:11:07 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
66.   In the mid-1920’s the Hawthorne Works of the Western Electric Company was the scene of an intensive series of experiments that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers’ performance.

(A) that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers’ performance

(B) investigating the effects that changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance

(C) for investigating what are the effects in workers’ performance that changes in working conditions would cause

(D) that investigated changes in working conditions’ effects on workers’ performance

(E) to investigate what the effects changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance

答案是B,

但是“investigating the effects that changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance”是分词作定语修饰experiments,分词作定语表示所修饰的名词动作的多次重复,显然本句中的experiments并没有多次重复的含有。

请问E)“to investigate what the effects changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance”为什么不对
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-24 00:18:18 | 只看该作者
为什么每人回答呀?
板凳
发表于 2009-11-24 08:11:06 | 只看该作者
“分词作定语表示所修饰的名词动作的多次重复”这是谁说的?有依据吗?我觉得只要不是点动作就行。experiments是持续一段时间的动作,所以没什么问题。
E里面,effects名词复数,changes又是单数动词错;而且后面又多了一个动词would have。如果把effects changes看作名词的话也得用effect changes, 就好像apple trees一样,而不是apples trees
地板
发表于 2009-11-24 08:44:34 | 只看该作者
B说不出不好,只能来看E的不好。
(E) to investigate what the effects changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance
你看一下what从句里面的结构,主谓宾分别是什么。有what和effects两个宾语了。但我也感觉读的满通的。也有点confused。
不过,原句的意思就是investigate是作修饰成分修饰experiment的。改成to do结构变成目的状语修饰was,完全改变了句子的意思。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 07:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部