关于代词指代不明问题请教？

黄公子

请问各位一个语法问题

划线部分出现it/they/their等，有时候错误是某个代词可以指代划线前面出现的好几个词

造成指代不明而判断为错误。

遇到这种情况要怎么迅速判断

1  看某代词前有多少个词可以指代(单复数一样或词性一样)，如果超过一个就直接判断代词指代错误，而不去分析结构。

     比如OG11中63题，their前面有rhinoceroses 和 tourists ，就直接判断their指代模糊

2  根据逻辑意思分析一通

如果直接按照方法一就可以判断出，那时间快很多，请大家指点，谢谢

黄公子

顶

笨笨可可

这个很难解释。。

代词指代的问题，看官方的，一般情况下是选最优的，并没有说前面几个名词有多少，就会产生代词模糊。。

黄公子

恩，一会总结下这类题目看看有没有规律

thnaks

夜凉如水

A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.
(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could
(D) think that they will be or could
(E) think the power stations would or could

在这道题目中，选C

官方解释说：

The corrected sentence must have a compound main verb view…but (verb); that is, the best answer above must begin with a verb that can be linked with view to complete the construction. Consequently, choices A, B, and C are incorrect. In choice E, would is faulty because it suggests without warrant that the stations would be made safe if some unnamed conditions were met. Choice D is best: that, although not essential, is preferable here; they is better than the needless repetition of power stations in choice E; and the verb tenses are correct. The question is more difficult than the average.

黄公子

PREP破解版语法注释分析有这么一句话

在OG中经常会认为一个句子中如果出现两个以上上的复数名词,则复数代词会出现指代不清的错误,然而在实战中是不能仅仅凭这一个准则来判断句子的正误.在指代原则中有一条就近指代原则: 当一个句子中出现两个以上的复数名词时,复数代词优先指代离它近的复数名词,这条原则用样适用于单数名词.