ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1519|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-2-3 头晕啊,大牛帮忙

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-7-24 16:11:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-2-3 头晕啊,大牛帮忙

GWD 2-3

Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.

 

  1. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were
  2. is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was
  3. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were
  4. are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was
  5. are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were

D和E排除没什么话好说,但是ABC三个选项就有点晕了。

我也看出了the deal were是虚拟语气,但是A和C之间很难选择,即使选了C(正确答案),我也不明白为什么中间有个be

沙发
发表于 2007-7-24 17:14:00 | 只看该作者

这道题是争议A和C。

个人觉得应该选A。

C 里面的signed by them 感觉不爽。

Open to discuss............

板凳
发表于 2007-7-24 17:22:00 | 只看该作者

个人觉得A最大障碍在a merger agreement is signed that includes ,that必须紧随修饰的名词。并且include在GMAC的题目中基本上是including的形式出现,that include wordy.

本题为什么用虚拟语气比较难判断,只能用排除法来作。

地板
发表于 2007-7-24 17:31:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用diyin在2007-7-24 17:22:00的发言:

个人觉得A最大障碍在a merger agreement is signed that includes ,that必须紧随修饰的名词。并且include在GMAC的题目中基本上是including的形式出现,that include wordy.

本题为什么用虚拟语气比较难判断,只能用排除法来作。

that 从句在有些情况下是可以跳跃修饰的,OG10SCth里面也有这样的例子。(主要是为了防止头重脚轻,在主语的定语从句过长,而谓语宾语较短的情况下出现)

建议LZ看一下置顶帖子里面前人的讨论,已经很清楚了。。。

Open to discuss........


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-24 17:32:15编辑过]
5#
发表于 2007-7-24 18:06:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用crowkiller在2007-7-24 17:31:00的发言:

that 从句在有些情况下是可以跳跃修饰的,OG10SCth里面也有这样的例子。(主要是为了防止头重脚轻,在主语的定语从句过长,而谓语宾语较短的情况下出现)

建议LZ看一下置顶帖子里面前人的讨论,已经很清楚了。。。

Open to discuss........


同意,这里that的修饰对象不会引起歧义

open to discuss

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-7-24 18:14:00 | 只看该作者

我也是看见by them,感觉不舒服把C 干掉的,但是答案偏偏是C。

我现在很想知道,GWD的答案究竟是谁做的,有没有权威性啊。别误人子弟啊

7#
发表于 2007-7-25 09:38:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢高手们! 那A的错误是否可以这样理解,if条件句的时态是有问题的,A的主句和if的时态不能对应。

8#
发表于 2007-7-28 02:53:00 | 只看该作者
C中主句用"IS expected", 从句用“signed by them” 是否是矛盾啊,主语应该是“one of the potential investors”,这个them指代不清。我推荐A
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 05:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部