又一道郁闷的语法题，NN解答一下吧＃

yizhoujiang

D可以看成是:not as a temporary  expedient  but as  a seemingly permanent  accommodation to the thing that many obnservers thought was an  economy  made over  productive by  advances  in technology  .

lanyuqi

我知道what 是怎么用的。只是介词to 之后要接 名词、doing 、或者是what引导的从句，不能引导一个句子（主谓结构）。可是  accommodation to 接的就是一个句子啊。这样的结构是不对的。

mbz

以下是引用lanyuqi在2007-2-4 13:22:00的发言：
我知道what 是怎么用的。只是介词to 之后要接 名词、doing 、或者是what引导的从句，不能引导一个句子（主谓结构）。可是  accommodation to 接的就是一个句子啊。这样的结构是不对的。

In D: "what  many obnservers thought was an  economy  made over  productive by  advances  in technology ."

is not a sentence, just a noun phrase.

lanyuqi

以下是引用mbz在2007-2-4 13:29:00的发言：

In D: "what  many obnservers thought was an  economy  made over  productive by  advances  in technology ."

is not a sentence, just a noun phrase.

不是句子吗，what  many obnservers thought是what 从句作主语， was 是谓语啊。

mbz

accommodation to what many obnservers thought was an  economy  made over  productive by  advances  in technology 

the red words can be omitted, and "what was an ...." is just a phrase, not a sentence.

lanyuqi

那你的意思是many obnservers thought 是插入语啊

lanyuqi

可以解释一下这句话吗what many obnservers thought was an  economy  made over  productive by  advances  in technology 

yizhoujiang

accommodation to the thing that many observers thought was an  economy  made over  productive by  advances  in technology 

"the thing"就是名词,后面"that"从句修饰"the thing" .  "many observers thought"可以忽略不看而不影响句意。即“the thing that was an economy ......"

"what  many obnservers thought was an  economy  made over  productive by  advances  in technology ." 其实就是"the thing that..."的变体，两者没什么区别。无非是省略了“the thing that" 因此你可以把后面一整句话看成一个noun phrase