ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3547|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

a更符合并列,为什么不选?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-10-24 21:54:00 | 只看该作者

a更符合并列,为什么不选?

11.    Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century feminist, called for urban apartment houses including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities.
(A) including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities
(B) that included child-care facilities, and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities
(C) with child-care facilities included and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities
(D) that included child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities
(E) to include child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities included
答案是d,为什么a那么平衡就不选?
沙发
发表于 2003-10-24 23:41:00 | 只看该作者
A中的clustered suburban houses前缺for。
D在形式上虽然不对称,但功能上是对称的。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-10-24 23:44:00 | 只看该作者
for不能省略吗?
把for a and for b写成for a and b不行吗?
什么时候可以省略呢?
地板
发表于 2003-10-24 23:49:00 | 只看该作者
这里的for 如果省略的话会有歧义.

clustered suburban houses  是和 urban apartment houses 并列 而不是和child-care facilities 并列.
5#
发表于 2003-10-24 23:50:00 | 只看该作者
但在这里,第二个FOR离第一个太远了。
中间的成份太多,没有FOR容易被误认为与其它成份并列。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-10-25 00:07:00 | 只看该作者
明白了,介词还是少省为妙,对吧?
7#
发表于 2003-10-25 00:19:00 | 只看该作者
尤其是在容易引起误解的时候不能省。
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-10-25 08:27:00 | 只看该作者
有道理
9#
发表于 2003-10-25 16:33:00 | 只看该作者
为何C和E不行啊?也是并列啊.
10#
发表于 2013-4-5 14:22:55 | 只看该作者
gemj 发表于 2003-10-24 23:50
但在这里,第二个FOR离第一个太远了。中间的成份太多,没有FOR容易被误认为与其它成份并列。 ...

nice explanation!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 02:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部