- P1: BAC over 0.1 & Motor accidents
- P2: how to reduce intoxication injury-1 tax on alcohol, can reduce
- P3: how 2, make dd criminal offense, doesn’t work very much, in Britain.
- P4: how 3, penalty, it depends; how 4, reha program, still doesn’t work very much, but raise public awareness; still need to resolve
- Key words: BAC, intoxication, alcohol, tax and penalty, Road Safety Act in 1967, Alcohol Safety Action Project-supported programs
- Intent: argue the intoxication contribute to motor accidents, and analyze several approaches and their little efficacy, call on further efforts
DABBB CCD
(5) 过度推理, As Britishers increasingly recognized that they could drink and not be stopped, the effectiveness declined, although in the ensuing three years the fatality rate seldom reached that observed in the seven years prior to the Act.只说有效性下降, 并不一定是上升.
Day 102
CR
assumption - B(A)
逻辑链:mummies predating Spanish showed disease — disease was not introduced by Spanish
A - 无关
B - 正确
C - 时间不对
D - 和哪种disease无关
E - 无关
explain - A
逻辑链:near fish-abudunt area & absence of other meats — absence of fish bones in kitchen remnants
这题怎么感觉所有答案都对
RC
P1: Risks of injury and death from motor vehicles: the higher BAC, higher probability of crashed
P2: It has been suggested higher taxes on alcohol could reduce alcohol consumption.
P3: Laws not serve as deterrents for DUI. example from Britain: laws need to be enforced
P4: Not sure if penalties or taxation will deter DUI. Therapy doesn’t help to reduced the DUI accidents. Same as rehab.
DC(A)BB B(A)CA(C)D