ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5829|回复: 38
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[阅读小分队] 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第161天 边际消费倾向(MPC)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2021-9-7 08:27:45 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

请大家在本帖回复:
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案

解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布

报名活动,加微信号killgmat

关注考什么试微信公众号~获取第一时间考试新闻,心经和经验分享



In economics, the concept of “propensity to consume” refers to the proportion of disposable income – income after taxes and transfers – that individuals spend on consumption. Marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is a related metric that quantifies induced consumption, the idea that as income increases a consumer’s consumption will also increase. MPC is the proportion of that additional income that an individual consumes; for example, if a household earns one extra dollar of disposable income, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.65, then of that dollar, the household will spend 65 cents and save 35 cents.

In a standard Keynesian model, the MPC will be less than the average propensity to consume (APC) because in the short-run some (autonomous) consumption does not change with income. Short-term decreases in income do not lead to reductions in consumption, because people reduce savings to stabilize consumption. Over the long-run, as wealth and income rise, consumption also rises; the marginal propensity to consume out of long-run income is closer to the average propensity to consume.

Economists often distinguish between the marginal propensity to consume out of permanent income and the marginal propensity to consume out of temporary income, because if consumers expect a change in income to be permanent, then they have a greater incentive to increase their consumption. This implies that the Keynesian multiplier – the measure of that consumption’s impact on additional consumption in the marketplace – should be larger in response to permanent changes in income than it is in response to temporary changes in income (though the earliest Keynesian analyses ignored these subtleties). However, the distinction between permanent and temporary changes in income is often subtle in practice, and it is often quite difficult to designate a particular change in income as being permanent or temporary. What is more, the marginal propensity to consume should also be affected by factors such as the prevailing interest rate and the general level of consumer surplus that can be derived from purchasing.


1. According to the passage, it can be inferred that:
A. When a household’s income increases, its marginal propensity to consume decreases.
B. Most households cannot accurately delineate between permanent and temporary changes in income.
C. Decreases in income generally lead to short-run increases in marginal propensity to consume.
D. Early Keynesian analyses did not allow for a Keynesian multiplier for income changes with regard to marginal propensity to consume.
E. In the short run, it is impossible for a household to have a negative marginal propensity to consume.


2. According to the passage, Keynesian multipliers should be larger for permanent changes in income than for temporary changes in income because:
A. The distinction between permanent and temporary is often difficult to categorize.
B. Consumers are more likely to spend temporary income than permanent income.
C. The prevailing interest rate is an important factor that consumers generally consider when deciding to spend temporary income.
D. Consumers have less incentive to increase their consumption due to temporary income than due to permanent income.
E. Average propensity to consume is less variant than marginal propensity to consume.


3. The primary purpose of the passage is to:
A. Predict that marginal propensity to consume is higher for permanent income than for temporary income.
B. Explain how the standard Keynesian model differentiates between marginal propensity to consume and average propensity to consume.
C. Argue that marginal propensity to consume converges with average propensity to consume as incomes become substantially higher.
D. Explain the concept of marginal propensity to consume and its variance among different types and levels of income.
E. Detail the implication of higher income and wealth levels on a household’s marginal propensity to consume.


参考答案:
CDD

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2021-9-7 22:18:40 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
板凳
发表于 2021-9-7 23:13:21 来自手机 | 只看该作者
DDD
地板
发表于 2021-9-8 01:44:24 发自手机 Web 版 | 只看该作者
1
5#
发表于 2021-9-8 10:10:19 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
6#
发表于 2021-9-8 18:28:11 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
mark
7#
发表于 2021-9-8 23:20:10 | 只看该作者
BDD
8#
发表于 2021-9-9 11:17:38 | 只看该作者
Mark
9#
发表于 2021-9-13 06:58:13 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
谢谢
10#
发表于 2021-9-13 10:05:46 | 只看该作者
同意!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-25 23:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部