ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2187|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-11-Q10快考了,问一个讨论过的问题~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-10-10 22:44:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-11-Q10快考了,问一个讨论过的问题~

21号就要考试了,有些争议T还没弄懂,这里一个,只问一个知识点,讨论帖都看过了还是没搞清,不甘心就开了新帖,望BZ见谅~


GWD-11-Q10:


Marconi’s conception of the radio was as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation; instead, it is precisely the opposite, a tool for communicating with a large, public audience.






  1. Marconi’s conception of the radio was as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation; instead, it is
  2. Marconi conceived of the radio as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation, but which is
  3. Marconi conceived of the radio as a tool for private conversation that could substitute for the telephone; instead, it has become
  4. Marconi conceived of the radio to be a tool for private conversation, a substitute for the telephone, which has become
  5. Marconi conceived of the radio to be a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation, other than what it is,

CDers大多支持C,我选E



前面的讨论中有个GG说:


这道题的C选项有个严重的意思错误:


原文: a tool for private conversation是修饰telephone,而C选项却用去修饰a radio.


我觉得很有道理,但是NN讨论的时候都没指出来,请问该处应该如何理解啊?


还有E中的it算不算多余?前面都没人回答过的...


沙发
发表于 2005-10-11 11:49:00 | 只看该作者

E. conceive of something/somebody as something


不是 conceive of ... to be ... 所以 E 不对。


板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-10-12 00:10:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢BZ指点!


但是我还是没弄懂C中的逻辑意思问题~~

地板
发表于 2005-10-12 01:08:00 | 只看该作者

我不同意以下观点:


原文: a tool for private conversation是修饰telephone,而C选项却用去修饰a radio.


我认为:


a tool for private conversation 应该是radio 的同位语,这样的话才和未划线部分a tool....取得逻辑意思上的一致。


即:the radio (was as a substitute for the telephone), a tool for private conversation; instead, it (it指代radio) is precisely the opposite, a tool for communicating with a large, public audience.


本句的focus 应该是:关于radio设计初衷和实际发展的对比,因此个人感觉句子在整体结构上要平衡。


另外,处理此题,我个人步骤为:


1,to be 要用as 替换,排除DE。


2,A的名词短语表述没有BCDE到位,另外,由BC的as和DE的to be 是明显的考点标志,所以排除A。


3,B中的but which... 属于定语从句指代模糊。


得到选项C,此时对句子结构,意思并不是很了解。但是,我一直觉得YMH讲对有道理,做SC最重要的就是思路简洁,原则明确。


希望大家讨论,并祝楼主GMAT 700++。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 18:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部