ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4479|回复: 11

2018OG 新题770 求指教

[复制链接]
发表于 2018-4-22 22:42:51 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Although a number of excellent studies narrate the development of domestic technology and its impact on housewifery, these works do not discuss the contributions of the women employed by manufacturers and utility companies as product demonstrators and publicists, who initially promoted new and unfamiliar technology to female customers.

(A) by manufacturers and utility companies as product demonstrators and publicists,
(B) to be product demonstrators and publicists by manufacturers and utility companies,
(C) to demonstrate and publicize their products by manufacturers and utility companies
(D) by manufacturers and utility companies to be demonstrators and publicists of their products
(E) by manufacturers and utility companies to demonstrate and publicize their products

正确答案是A。在gmatclub和beatthegmat论坛上都看到说因为who只能修饰人,而只有A选项最后几个词是人,直接选A。我想问一下在SC里出现的定语从句都一定紧跟它修饰的那个词吗?我在做这道题的时候想的是who引导的定语从句只能修饰人嘛,那肯定是修饰之前出现的the women 了,于是一直在E和A之间纠结(因为反正定从没法紧跟先行词)。而且从句意上来想,这句话本来就是想强调被忽视的一部分女性的贡献,是说这些被manufacturers和companies雇作demonstrators和publicists的女性是最开始像女性消费者推销新技术的吧?我觉得who引导的定语从句修饰泛泛而谈的demonstrators和publicists有点牵强。想听听各位大神如何判断定从修饰的先行词的。多谢啦!




 楼主| 发表于 2018-4-26 21:08:41 | 显示全部楼层
求大神解析
发表于 2018-4-27 14:43:24 | 显示全部楼层
product demonstrators and publicists不就修饰的正是人吗
I am a student who love studying. Who 直接紧跟student,修饰student,而我就是student。I=STUDENT
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-1 01:50:38 | 显示全部楼层
招拆猫猫拳 发表于 2018-4-27 14:43
product demonstrators and publicists不就修饰的正是人吗
I am a student who love studying. Who 直接紧 ...

多谢回答。不过我想问的是who initially promoted new and unfamiliar technology to female customers为什么不能修饰the women,而一定要修饰product demonstrators and publicists?
发表于 2018-5-1 14:32:39 | 显示全部楼层
Yiyi17 发表于 2018-5-1 01:50
多谢回答。不过我想问的是who initially promoted new and unfamiliar technology to female customers为 ...

定语从句就近修饰,指的是就近修饰名词或核心词,E里"by manufacturers and utility companies to demonstrate and publicize their products"是状语修饰"employed"这个动作,谓语不能被跳跃。
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/v48ndRueRQP4yf6OIllbyg
上面这个关于定语从句跳跃修饰的帖子供你参考哈~
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-2 02:53:31 | 显示全部楼层
索菲鱼 发表于 2018-5-1 14:32
定语从句就近修饰,指的是就近修饰名词或核心词,E里"by manufacturers and utility companies to demons ...

谢谢啦~ 虽然看完链接有些地方不太能同意,不过这道题的疑惑基本解决啦
发表于 2018-5-2 11:48:31 | 显示全部楼层
Yiyi17 发表于 2018-5-2 02:53
谢谢啦~ 虽然看完链接有些地方不太能同意,不过这道题的疑惑基本解决啦

嘿嘿,能帮到你就好啦~
发表于 2019-2-28 10:35:50 | 显示全部楼层
看到lz的其他帖子了,羡慕lz有这么好package,现在应该已经在准备申请了吧?应该也不用再刷分了。

对lz的提问说两句我的想法。定语从句不一定紧跟修饰的词,GMAC其实并没有绝对不能打破的语法规则,定语从句和被修饰词是越近越好,但真的不排除有两者最近的选项中也隔着十几个词的情况。我觉得有些SC讲义的思路是有问题的,我极其怀疑GMAC在出SC题目时根本不是按语法规则出题,而是按语义出题。
我们仔细想一想这题的逻辑,who后面说的是这帮人向women推广了产品,所以who在语义上真的是要修饰demonstrators and publicists吗?我觉得不是。不是所有的demonstrator都能向women推广,这句话想表达的意思是女性走上了这些工作岗位才把产品推广到女性群体中,所以who从句在语义上应该是修饰women demonstrators and publicists,也就是lz说的women。E不如A的地方我觉得并不是who挨不挨着人,而是E选项的their指代不清
发表于 2019-2-28 21:07:57 | 显示全部楼层
这道题的who如果真的修饰前面的什么的话也应该是  the contributions of the women
 楼主| 发表于 2019-3-1 00:20:30 | 显示全部楼层
HoganTong 发表于 2019-2-28 10:35
看到lz的其他帖子了,羡慕lz有这么好package,现在应该已经在准备申请了吧?应该也不用再刷分了。

对lz的 ...

感谢分享,感觉你思路非常清晰
离这个帖子居然都快一年了,我也懒得再刷分也看了看你的其他帖子,觉得背景经验过硬啊,是不是也是最近开始申请?我琢磨着今年申请M7的小伙伴们大家加个群,suffer together
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-3-29 02:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部