逵逵问题

howardwang

TO 爱无伤 mm

谢谢！

这个帖子总结的很好，我以前也拜读过。但是，不能绝对，我记不清了，在大全的某个题中，看到过类似B中的省略。

正因为以前看过你上面的帖子，所以，我也想选C。可是，当我想将C中than后面的因素补全时，却陷入了迷茫。如果让我补全，我觉得C的错误不是所谓的可能的歧义，而是根本性的逻辑错误。

不知道MM如何补足THAN后省略的成分？请赐教。

爱无伤

TO howardwang

可不可以说明一下你觉得that后省略了什么？有什么歧义？或是有什么逻辑错误？

我看半天没看出来~

OG19题说了像B中这种省略是不行的，所以我一直都不敢选B。

howardwang

TO 爱无伤

我觉得，than在此应该是连词，也就是说，than后面是个完整的句子（通常可以省略许多成分）。如果确实如此，我们应该可以将than后省略的成分补充出来。

而我不知道答案Cwild animals have less total fat than that of livestock fed on grain and have more fat of a kind thought to be 中的that of livestock fed on grain 在补充出的句子中是主语还是宾语，如果是宾语，那句子的主语和谓语应该是什么？

请指点！

howardwang

刚刚找到一位前辈关于THAN的用法的解释,希望有所帮助。

than  
conj.

1. Used after a comparative adjective or adverb to introduce the second element or clause of an unequal comparison: She is a better athlete than I.
   
2. Used to introduce the second element after certain words indicating difference: He draws quite differently than she does.
   
3. When. Used especially after hardly and scarcely: I had scarcely walked in the door than the commotion started.

prep.

In comparison or contrast with: could run faster than him; outclassed everyone other than her.

Usage Note: Since the 18th century grammarians have insisted that than should be regarded as a conjunction in all its uses, so that a sentence such as Bill is taller than Tom should be construed as an elliptical version of the sentence Bill is taller than Tom is. According to this view, the case of a pronoun following than is determined by whether the pronoun serves as the subject or object of the verb that is “understood.” Thus, the standard rule requires Pat is taller than I (not me) on the assumption that this sentence is elliptical for Pat is taller than I am but allows The news surprised Pat more than me, since this sentence is taken as elliptical for The news surprised Pat more than it surprised me. However, than is quite commonly treated as a preposition when followed by an isolated noun phrase, and as such occurs with a pronoun in the objective case: John is taller than me. Though this usage is still widely regarded as incorrect, it is predominant in speech and has reputable literary precedent, appearing in the writing of such respected authors as Shakespeare, Johnson, Swift, Scott, and Faulkner. It is also consistent with the fact that than is clearly treated as a preposition in the than whom construction, as in a poet than whom (not than who) no one has a dearer place in the hearts of his countrymen. Still, the writer who risks a sentence like Mary is taller than him in formal writing must be prepared to defend the usage against objections of critics who are unlikely to be dissuaded from the conviction that the usage is incorrect. ·Comparatives using as... as can be analyzed as parallel to those using than. Traditional grammarians insist that I am not as tall as he is the only correct form; in formal writing, one should adhere to this rule. However, one can cite both literary precedent and syntactic arguments in favor of analyzing the second as as a preposition (which would allow constructions such as I am not as tall as him).

likui

嚯嚯，大家气氛不错，我再打点题目出来大家研究研究。

爱无伤

我觉得是省略了is--wild animals have less total fat than that of livestock fed on grain (is) and have more fat of a kind thought to be

爱无伤

我觉得这个题的比较方式和大全777很像：

1.        The man was always aware, sometimes proudly and sometimes resentfully, that he was a small-town Midwesterner who was thrust into a world that was dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than him.

(A) who was thrust into a world that was dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than him

(B) who had been thrust into a world that was dominated by more wealthy, educated, and polished people than him

(C) who had been thrust into a world dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and people more polished than he was

(D) thrust into a world dominated by more wealthy, educated, and polished people than him（E）

(E) thrust into a world dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than he

答案E的be后据NN们讨论是省略了was,那么

wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than he was

less total fat than that of livestock fed on grain (is)

是不是很像？

B省略会造成歧义，所以B省略了就是不对的。

爱无伤

以下是引用likui在2005-8-5 17:24:00的发言：
嚯嚯，大家气氛不错，我再打点题目出来大家研究研究。

欢迎欢迎，不过就要辛苦逵逵了~

howardwang

以下是引用爱无伤在2005-8-5 17:51:00的发言：

我觉得这个题的比较方式和大全777很像：

1.        The man was always aware, sometimes proudly and sometimes resentfully, that he was a small-town Midwesterner who was thrust into a world that was dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than him.

E thrust into a world dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than he

答案E的be后据NN们讨论是省略了was,那么

wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than he was

less total fat than that of livestock fed on grain (is)

是不是很像？

B省略会造成歧义，所以B省略了就是不对的。

首先,谢谢爱无伤！

大全我还有许多没做，但是就本题而言，如果e是答案，那么he是主格，应该是主语。如果省略了谓语，为什么不补足呢？不补足不会引起歧义吗？

整个句子不足应该是：

a world was dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than he dominated the world. 或者类似的被动语态 a world was dominated by he.

that of livestock fed on grain (is) 后面的表语是什么？

还是没明白？继续讨论？

爱无伤

如果一定要补全的话我觉得应该是这样的:

he was wealthy, educated and polished.

that of livestock fed on grain is little

表语都是与比较级对应的。比较型状语从句一般来说都会这样，省略的部分与比较级对应。