6月16日成绩出炉

lzd99

终于能查分了，复习了大约半个月，考出这样的成绩我也满意了，终于可以申请学校了！

 

Test	Test Date	Reading	Listening	Speaking	Writing	Total
TELXML	June 16, 2007	25	28	20	24	97

How to interpret scores?

Reading  Skills	Level	Your Performance
Reading	High(22-30)	Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading abilities regardless of the difficulty of the texts. Test takers who score at the HIGH level, typically have a very good command of academic vocabulary and grammatical structure; can understand and connect information, make appropriate inferences, and synthesize ideas, even when the text is conceptually dense and the language is complex; can recognize the expository organization of a text and the role that specific information serves within the larger text, even when the text is conceptually dense; and can abstract major ideas from a text, even when the text is conceptually dense and contains complex language.
Listening  Skills	Level	Your Performance
Listening	High(22-30)	Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms, or colloquial or figurative language), complex grammatical structures, abstract or complex ideas, and/or making sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information. When listening to lectures and conversations like these, test takers at the HIGH level typically can understand main ideas and important details, whether they are stated or implied; distinguish more important ideas from less important ones; understand how information is being used (for example, to provide evidence for a claim or describe a step in a complex process); recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship); understand many different ways that speakers use language for purposes other than to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and synthesize information, even when it is not presented in sequence, and make correct inferences on the basis of that information.
Speaking  Skills	Level	Your Performance
Speaking about familiar topics	Fair(2.5 - 3.0)	Your responses indicate you are able to speak in English about your personal experiences and opinions in a mostly clear and coherent manner. Your speech is mostly clear with only occasional errors. Grammar and vocabulary are somewhat limited and include some errors. At times, the limitations prevent you from elaborating fully on your ideas, but they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.
Speaking about campus situations	Fair(2.5 - 3.0)	Your responses demonstrate an ability to speak in English about reading material and experiences typically encountered by university students. You are able to convey relevant information about conversations, newspaper articles, and campus bulletins; however, some details are missing or inaccurate. Limitations of grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation at times cause difficulty for the listener. However, they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.
Speaking about academic course content	Fair(2.5 - 3.0)	Your responses demonstrate that you are able to speak in English about academic reading and lecture material, with only minor communication problems. For the most part, your speech is clear and easy to understand. However, some problems with pronunciation and intonation may occasionally cause difficulty for the listener. Your use of grammar and vocabulary is adequate to talk about the topics, but some ideas are not fully developed or are inaccurate.
Writing  Skills	Level	Your Performance
Writing based on reading and listening	Fair(2.5 - 3.5)	You responded to the task, relating the lecture to the reading, but your response indicates weaknesses such as an important idea or ideas may be missing, unclear, or inaccurate; there may be unclarity in how the lecture and the reading passage are related; and/or grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may make the writing difficult to understand.
Writing based on knowledge and experience	Good(4.0 - 5.0)	You responded with a well-organized and developed essay. Weaknesses, if you have any, might have to do with use of English that is occasionally ungrammatical, unclear, or unidiomatic and/or elaboration of ideas or connection of ideas that could have been stronger.

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-4 3:59:12编辑过]

bigbighead

请问你在哪里查到的 为什么我查不到的？

GenieWoo

这几天每天早上都爬起来查。不过我也查不到阿

lzd99

我在美国，ets的网站上, 难道国内还没出来？

bigbighead

恩 还没啊 我刚打电话去北京ETS  她们说等星期五 再去查 - -

GenieWoo

那就是后天拉~ 美国肯定会比我们这里快~

lissy_721

cong!

成绩很好啊

东岸再见

mm的listening好棒啊！

恭喜mm!!

qianrene

恭喜MM，请问这个分数能申请什么排名的学校呀？

lzd99

我不想去top的学校，因为在附近买了房子，还要工作，也不能走太远，附近有所州立大学还不错，全美排名前60，试着申请一下，我也不需要奖学金，估计这个分数够用了。

考IBT的前几天，正赶上美国PBT 放号，为了以防万一IBT没考好，我还报了个8月16号的PBT, 真是给ETS捐了不少钱！

打算在考一次PBT，不打算复习了，纯属娱乐！呵呵！！

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-4 10:21:47编辑过]