ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 991|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 12 38题求个指导纠结上了-0 -

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-9-27 21:40:58 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
38. In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal
political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.
(A) arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
(B) arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
(C) a treatise that advocates women’s equal political and legal rights
(D) a treatise advocating women’s equal political and legal rights
(E) a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women

别的其实都清楚了就是想知道这里我选E之后的平行按理来说就是for equal...和for changes的平行。可是会不会与歧义觉得是for changes和for women平行呢??我原来做到这里的时候就不小心觉得会歧义因为有两个for把E排除了。
后来我想会不会是另外一种平行直接带入就变成了 for equal political and legal rights for changes完全不符合逻辑所以不算有歧义呢?是不是之前我对歧义的理解有问题呢。。。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-27 22:40:14 | 只看该作者
顶一下顶一下
板凳
发表于 2014-12-21 23:06:40 | 只看该作者
change和women怎么平行啊= = 两种不同的东西
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 00:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部