一道读起来好费劲的题目啊--欢迎讨论

kluivert

我读题目就读了两遍



Though the strict syntax of the current prevailing animation scripting language has entirely replaced the now deprecated notation of former script generations, the fact remains that amateurs and professionals who lack up-to-date training continue to produce code in such relatively primitive languages, despite the browsers' software houses attempt to enforce progress by updating common browsers so that they cannot render the animation encoded by such scripts.

Which of the following best explains the failure of the plan devised by the software houses?

A. The new syntax prevents multiple possible interpretations of command lines in scripts while significantly increasing the time untrained code-writers must spend on debugging their syntax mistakes compared to older and more generic version of the script.

B. Certain large research and development departments or institutions require systems that can render sophisticated animations in closed computing environments which do not necessitate browser compatibility.

C. Despite the rapid rate of evolution in Internet browsing software, outdated browsers, which cannot render high-end graphics programmed in highly-structured scripts, are quickly becoming a thing of the past thanks to online updating mechanisms.

D. An online survey conducted by the giant software houses behind famous browsers such as Voyager, Firelocks, Savana, and Drome has discovered that even though some features of old scripts are available on these browsers, few people if any know that.

E. Current scripted animation training programs include, on top of comprehensive training in the most up-to-date scripting language available today, a summarized review of former reincarnations of those scripting languages, for the sake of comparison.

L.M.

那么我来试一试吧。。。

首先这是个“explains the failure of the plan”，也就是个plan—goal型的题，而且有点像resolve paradox类的题。那么，先一板一眼地分析argument：

第一个逗号：新的（动画编程语言？）ASL基本上取代了FSG，
第二个逗号：但事实上很多业余玩家和跟不上趟的专家仍然在用原始的版本（FSG），
第三个逗号：尽管浏览器那边想通过update来阻止such script（指代FSG）

（这么多的信息非得写一句话，是秀语法还是搞事情啊。。。。）

plan：浏览器update，以阻止FSG的应用
goal（失败）：更少人使用FSG。

A：新编码阻止了interpretation，导致没玩过的程序员必须花比旧编码更多时间来debug。给出了旧编码的优势。但是plan是在浏览器上掐掉了旧编码，而这个选项没有说明旧编码的优势与plan中的兼容性的问题。
B：一些机构学院需要能够在内网里运行过气动画的编程语言，运行时候不需要浏览器兼容性。给出了旧语言的其他用处，且正面反对plan里面提到的兼容性。
C：不能运行新编码的浏览器很快就过时了。但是plan里讨论的是不支持旧编码的浏览器。无关选项。
D：浏览器业界大佬调研表示，哪怕浏览器上面支持旧编码，很多人都不知道。这里没有讨论popularity，只讨论浏览器->script selection。无关。
E：现在的编码课为了方便理解与比对，会介绍以往的编程语言。没有讨论plan的影响，是无关的。

综上，我觉得B选项可能要好一些。但是A选项我也有点拿不准。。。

（以及这个词汇、这个阅读量，LZ是在哪儿搞的这个题啊）

kluivert

L.M. 发表于 2018-9-10 22:08
那么我来试一试吧。。。

首先这是个“explains the failure of the plan”，也就是个plan—goal型的题，而 ...

Gmatclub上贴的 呵呵 这题的阅读其实还好，乍一看很吓人，其实没那么恐怖。有些CR题真的是花2，3分钟才能读懂

kluivert

A选项和措施没任何关系

措施是：更新浏览器（不支持旧版）来加快跟新换代
而结果：依然没有阻止很多人继续使用旧版

A 使用新版会带给缺乏培训的旧版使用者的极大的不便.... 这和措施没任何关系 ...我们要对措施失败找原因