ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1479|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

整理了一道神一般的原题。出了三种不同位置的BF题。

[精华] [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-6-12 23:50:21 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
都出自PREP所以可信度是没有问题的,同种颜色的是一题目,括号里的是正确选项内容。供大家感受一下。

Incountries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is notcovered.is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argumentis evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizesSome commentators have argued, correctly,that since there is presently no objective test for whiplashis evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identifiedis that conclusion.  These commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious(is that conclusion):  clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2015-6-17 00:13:37 | 只看该作者
居然没有人看。也是深深的醉了。。。。。。。。。。哈哈。不过被加精了,太开心~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 07:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部