T-4-Q30 with 独立主格

默默楚

207.(T-4-Q30)Unlike the short flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, which carried sufficient power in fuel cells and batteries, a permanently orbiting space station will have to generate its own electricity.

A.the short flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, which carried sufficient power in fuel cells and batteries,

B.the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, with sufficient enough power in fuel cells and batteries for their short flights,

C.the short flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, which enabled them to carry sufficient enough power in fuel cells and batteries,

D.the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, which were capable of carrying sufficient power in fuel cells and batteries for their short flights,(D)

E.the flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, whose shortness allowed them to carry sufficient power in fuel cells and batteries,

B选项 怎么错了  看了这么多贴 还是不明白
with独立主格修饰的是谁呀  
按Prep1-190 对独立主格的解释： 独立主格表伴随，只能修饰主谓宾结构。
B选项的with独立主格，就应该修饰后面 a permanently orbiting space station will have to generate its own electricity.
prep对这题B选项的解释是：with引导的独立主格结构有修饰歧义。
混乱呀 混乱  哪个NN来帮我理一下我的思绪  万分感谢！！

choiken

b的with哪里是独立主格，with+S+Ving才是独立主格

lovejinjin

Mark一下！               

lovejinjin

Mark一下！               

W...

请问，我在Manhattan prep帖子里看到，有人问Ron B的with是否有歧义，Ron回答并没有。
source：https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/sc-unlike-the-short-flights-of-the-shuttle-and-t8034-45.html
有人提问：I read a comment in other forums which said-
Other than redundancy, B is also wrong because the position of " with sufficient enough power in fuel cells and batteries for their short flights" leads to ambiguity.
Because "with xxxx" then could be modifying either the shuttle and earlier spacecraft or a permanently orbiting space station
Is that ambiguity a solid ground to eliminate this choice?

Ron的回答：^^ no, the meaning of that modifier is obvious enough.

请解答，谢谢！

muddycool

B 的sufficient 和 enough重复啊  所以一开始就排除了
好吧 我知道我的点很奇怪 勿拍

lylblue

自己明白了，有个earlier，用过去式也没错~~~看题不仔细啊。。。谢谢楼上！

DUKB24

弱弱地问一下D项中“were capable of”为什么可以用过去式？
因为这个我在BD挣扎时就把它排除了。。。

-- by 会员 lylblue (2012/11/5 12:24:16)

如果你描述一件已经发生了的事情


用过去式是合理的

lylblue

弱弱地问一下D项中“were capable of”为什么可以用过去式？
因为这个我在BD挣扎时就把它排除了。。。

默默楚

lz都说修饰后面的svo了，而原句修饰的是前面的名词，明显b选项改变了句子含义。

-- by 会员 yakev6 (2012/10/2 20:31:52)

with 独立主格是不是也可以修饰the short flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft 不然他怎么会说修饰歧义。
我的问题在于 prep1-190 对于with 独立主格的解释是  它只能修饰主谓宾结构  那么这题with就只能修饰后面的  而不能修饰the short flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft  这样就不存在修饰歧义了。。

-- by 会员 默默楚 (2012/10/2 20:46:38)

with是可以作为名词修饰语修饰前面的名词了，因此存在两种理解
1. 作为介宾结构修饰前面名词.
2. 作为独立主格修饰后面svo.
因此会修饰歧义。
楼主可以参照og13 第7题和114题
[tr][/tr][td=417][/td]114. Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regenerative ability, and if one arm is lost it quickly replaces it, sometimes by the animal overcompensating and growing an extra one or two.

(A) one arm is lost it quickly replaces it, sometimes by the animal overcompensating and

(B) one arm is lost it is quickly replaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating and

(C) they lose one arm they quickly replace it, sometimes by the animal overcompensating,

(D) they lose one arm they are quickly replaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating,

(E) they lose one arm it is quickly replaced, sometimes with the animal overcompensating[tr][/tr][td=417][/td]7. The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it evolved independently of the vertebrate eye.

(A) having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it

(B) having hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that they

(C) with its hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain scientists’ assuming that they

(D) with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain scientists’ assuming that it

(E) with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that it

-- by 会员 yakev6 (2012/10/2 23:48:09)

时隔这么长时间 又想问问大牛  with做介宾结构和独立主格结构有什么不一样么  结构上不一样么？ 怎么区分？