请教一道GWD逻辑题，谢谢！

哈妮宝贝1988

GWD-12-Q11:

In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations.However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools.This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A.The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia’s government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.

B.During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.

C.Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia’s government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession.

D.Teachers in Vargonia’s government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers.

E.During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded.

答案是B，我选择的C，想不通，帮帮忙吧，谢谢！

awronist

C无关。原文谈论的是如果将来出现recession会怎样怎样，C说得是现在（不一定是不是recession）和过去的最后一次recession之间的对比，根本没一点关系。
B说经济好的时候很多学生去读私立学校，这样可以推出recession时很多原来读私立学校的就会去读免费的公立学校。而法律又要求了公立学校的师生比例不能变，那只能多招老师了！

nowwsy

转：
C说的是现在（并不是这次的RECESSION）的老师就业比上次RECESSION前的就业多20%。对原文结论不起任何作用。因为你不知上次RECESSION老师就业情况。B说是最近经济好时25%学生去读私立学校，付高昂的学费，这样将来RECESSION时，就有可能这些学生中的一部分因付不起高昂的学费而去读公立学校，使学生和老师比例更大，对老师的需求也大。从而加强结论：将来RECESSION是公立学校老师不会失业。