ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places have been cited by a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election, which estimated that they did not count 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3421|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-1-Q29关于E选项的夹心结构

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-6 00:04:22 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD-1-Q29关于E选项的夹心结构

Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places have been cited by a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election, which estimated that they did not count 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast.

A.    Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places have been cited by a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election, which estimated that they did not count 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast.
B.    Citing faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places, a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election has estimated that 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast were not counted.
C.    Citing faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places, 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast were not counted in the 2000 United States presidential election, a new study estimates.
D.    A new study has cited faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places in estimating that 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes that were cast had not been counted in the 2000 United States presidential election.
E.    A new study of the 2000 United States presidential election, citing faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places, has estimated 4 million to 6 million votes had not been counted of the 100 million votes cast.

答案选B

对答案没什么异议,只是很想请教一下B选项的夹心结构。
貌似这是ETS常考内容之一,但是一直都不是很理解。

官方解释是“引起歧义,既能修饰前面,又能修饰后面”,可是怎样才算是引起歧义呢?我真的是常常都看不出来呢。大家都是根据什么来判断的呢?如果在不能快速看懂题的前提下,还有什么方法呢?通过词性判断?还是什么?

希望大家多多排砖哦!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
板凳
发表于 2014-5-28 16:59:02 | 只看该作者
弱弱的问一下,你的答案解析式在哪儿看到的啊
沙发
发表于 2010-5-6 10:35:57 | 只看该作者
我说说自己的思考步骤 希望对楼主有用
读完题后比较了AB.A是被动,所以B优先。C选项逻辑错误,4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast 不能做citing的逻辑主语。D选项were cast 与had not been counted 时间关系错误。应该是投票在前,机票在后,所以过去完成时不对。
E estimate 用法错误。楼主平时要总结出现频率高的考点。做语法要想做数学套公式一样,见到什么形式就套相应的考点。这个能力是在做题过程中慢慢积累的。
                                                                     个人见解  仅供参考O(∩_∩)O~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 21:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部