gmat难题300

全幼儿园最可爱a

Rejecting its argument that the Masters Dog Training Club’s primary aim was to teach people to train dogs, the court ruled the club ineligible for tax exemption as an educational group.

A Rejecting its argument that the Masters Dog Training Club’s primary aim was to teach people to train dogs, the court ruled the club ineligible for tax exemption as an educational group.

C Rejecting the argument that the primary aim of the Masters Dog Training Club was to teach people to train dogs, the court ruled that the club was ineligible for exemption from taxes as an educational group.

在网上没看到解释。答案是C，我选的A，因为觉得A简洁。想问一下A的错误是不是在the court ruled the club ineligible for tax exemption，误解成tax exemption是ineligible的？

然后C说exemption from taxes，那A说tax exemption也是对的吧？

as an educational group是不是隔the club太远了也不太好，但是没有更好选项了也算对？

谢谢大佬

没有马甲

Rejecting its argument that the Masters Dog Training Club’s primary aim was to teach people to train dogs, the court ruled the club ineligible for tax exemption as an educational group.

A Rejecting its argument that the Masters Dog Training Club’s primary aim was to teach people to train dogs, the court ruled the club ineligible for tax exemption as an educational group.
B In rejecting the Masters Dog Training Club’s argument that their primary aim was to teach people to train dogs, the court ruled the club ineligible to be exempted of taxes as an educational group.
C Rejecting the argument that the primary aim of the Masters Dog Training Club was to teach people to train dogs, the court ruled that the club was ineligible for exemption from taxes as an educational group.
D The club was not to be exempted of taxes as an educational group, ruled the court by rejecting its argument that the primary aim of the Masters Dog Training Club was teaching people to train dogs.
E The court ruled the Masters Dog Training Club not eligible to be exempted from taxes as an educational group, rejecting the argument that the primary aim was to teach people to train dogs.

我认为E的错误：
1.the court rule that ... 法院规定一个事儿，从逻辑上来讲就要用that从句。
E表明the court ruled the ... Club ×
2.后半句the primary aim没说是谁的aim
3.V-ing有几种用法（源自：RON）：①immediate result
②way in which the preceding statement works or is true
③more specific description of the preceding statement
我认为这里原文想要表达的意思是①这种用法。
法院先reject the argument， 然后rule that ...
因此，rejecting the arguemnt要放在前面。（位置问题请自行查看manhattan SC，书里有详细的解释）

hope it make sense

全幼儿园最可爱a

神风特攻 发表于 2019-11-21 19:42
请问E哪里错了

你把E粘贴一下，我找不到了

神风特攻

请问E哪里错了

备战托福少年

its指代不清  its 可以指代所有格 所以可能会指代Masters Dog Training Club’s

全幼儿园最可爱a

momoyi 发表于 2019-11-10 15:51
exemption from
固定搭配

好的谢谢

momoyi

全幼儿园最可爱a 发表于 2019-11-10 15:29
然后exemption from taxes为什么要这么写啊

exemption from
固定搭配

momoyi

全幼儿园最可爱a 发表于 2019-11-10 15:26
用its是指代不清吗

是语义逻辑不对啦
法庭拒绝自己的argument, 然后规定bla bla
这法庭是不是脑子进水了

法庭拒绝了一个argument，然后规定bla bla
这样才符合逻辑嘛

全幼儿园最可爱a

momoyi 发表于 2019-11-10 13:20
首先，你不能用简洁来排除选项啦。
你问得两道题都是这样排除的，wordy永远不是绝对错误。

然后exemption from taxes为什么要这么写啊

全幼儿园最可爱a

momoyi 发表于 2019-11-10 13:20
首先，你不能用简洁来排除选项啦。
你问得两道题都是这样排除的，wordy永远不是绝对错误。

用its是指代不清吗