ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1062|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

RON在论坛的一个回复,没看懂,求大神解答!!感谢!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2019-8-30 10:43:33 发自手机 Web 版 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Good Day Ron
kindly tell me if the following construction legit atience Lovell Wright became well known as much for X as for Y.
according to jlucero (in the thread above ) this is correct but according to you this sentence has some redundancy issue . if this sentence has redundancy then kindly tell me how

Re:This sentence would be correct, because "well known" is separate from "as much".

I was describing the redundancy that would ensue from using both "well" AND "much" in the same construction.
E.g.,
My T-shirts are not as well worn as yours. (correct)
My T-shirts have not been worn as much as yours. (correct)
*My T-shirts have not been well worn as much as yours. (redundant)

为什么第一个例子的well known和as much是分开的,不是redundant,而最后一个例子就是redundant?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
板凳
发表于 2019-9-2 21:14:51 | 只看该作者
momoyi 发表于 2019-9-2 15:50
Lovell Wright became well known as much for X as for Y.

My T-shirts have not been well worn as much ...

同意!               
沙发
发表于 2019-9-2 15:50:01 | 只看该作者
Lovell Wright became well known as much for X as for Y.

My T-shirts have not been well worn as much as yours.

第一个 X,Y都是well know 发出的动作,well know for X as well know for Y.
这个well和much没有任何冲突。

第二个well worn和 worn as much as  说其中一个就可以了 as well worn as 或worn as much as
这两个意思一样,所以well和much, 明显的redundant。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-27 12:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部