ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 8283|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] 一道OG20新增语法题:关于代词,修辞结构:Despite the Puritan sumptuary laws prohibiting the weari..

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2019-6-27 17:41:07 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式

(OG20新增)Despite the Puritan sumptuary laws prohibiting the wearing of bright or elaborate clothing, if you had either a liberal education or an annual income of two hundred pounds one was permitted to display their material prosperity in public.

A if you had either a liberal education or annual income of two hundred pounds one was permitted the public display of their material prosperity
B if one had either a liberal education or annual income of two hundred pounds one was permitted the public display of their material prosperity
C having either a liberal education or annual income of two hundred pounds would allow one to publicly display their material prosperity
D those with either a liberal education or an annual income of two hundred pounds were allowed to display their material prosperity in public
E those having either a liberal education or annual income of two hundred pounds were permitted their public display of material prosperity

答案是D
附OG答案解析(图片里),但自己并没有太理解。主要没有理解选项D中"those"用法

我自己的理解如下:
排除ABC  their没有指代对象(没有符合语义的复数名词 )——》 比较DE    having没有with合理,   having强调onging状态 ——》 选D

希望有明白的小伙伴们来指导一下这道新题,顺便指导一下我的思路对不对~  感谢啦~


本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
12#
发表于 2019-11-8 04:24:49 | 只看该作者
为什么annual income 前面可以用an? OG上的解释完全没提到这一点,有人能帮解答一下这个知识点吗?是否是可数名词不能用来排除选项吗?
11#
发表于 2019-10-1 13:06:43 | 只看该作者
借楼求解释 啥叫不完全指代
10#
发表于 2019-9-28 19:07:47 | 只看该作者
这道题目我选了E,所以很不理解为啥D是对的。
我觉得用having比with更好,因为听一个老师的网课说with表示与某件事有关系,但是关系不明确,但having就很明确,就是表示拥有。
不知道如何说服自己E是正确的
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2019-7-22 14:48:40 | 只看该作者
TheLoneRanger 发表于 2019-7-21 14:32
感谢楼主分享的OG解析
解析里说ABC错在one跟their不能合在一起用,如果用one‘s的话会比较好一些
然后E的解 ...

比较DE 选项D的结构比选项E更加平行:a liberal education or (an)  annual income;  选项D display... in public 动词结构优于名词结构 选项E their public display  综上,选项D表达更好  
8#
发表于 2019-7-21 14:32:24 | 只看该作者
感谢楼主分享的OG解析
解析里说ABC错在one跟their不能合在一起用,如果用one‘s的话会比较好一些
然后E的解释就有些牵强,说的是语意上的问题,也就是E让原句看起来是达到这些要求的教徒都争着想展示,现在只不过是被允许了而已,具体定位到 were permitted their public display of material prosperity

至于having,个人认为是没问题的
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2019-7-19 10:20:43 | 只看该作者
joeyqiushi 发表于 2019-7-18 17:48
those可以用于指代某个群体。给楼主点例句:
People with more social support tend to live longer than p ...

感谢回复~

你的例子可以很清楚地 看出  those (with...)  表示   与people 同类型的群体

但是这道题those在句子里没有指代的对象。 我比较同意楼上的说法: those 在这道题中是不完全指代,加上限定修饰with结构才有意义。
Despite the Puritan sumptuary laws prohibiting the wearing of bright or elaborate clothing, those with either a liberal education or an annual income of two hundred pounds were allowed to display their material prosperity in public
6#
发表于 2019-7-18 17:48:01 | 只看该作者
those可以用于指代某个群体。给楼主点例句:
People with more social support tend to live longer than people who are more isolated.
People with more social support tend to live longer than those who are more isolated.
Those with more social support tend to live longer than people who are more isolated.
Those with more social support tend to live longer than those who are more isolated.
四个句子都是完全等同的。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2019-7-6 08:52:52 | 只看该作者
GMAT760780 发表于 2019-7-5 12:07
不过提醒一下楼主,those裸奔是不完全指代,而且必须要加限定修饰才可以哦,这边的those之所以后面不用加 ...

哦哦,记住了!感谢!
地板
发表于 2019-7-5 12:07:58 | 只看该作者
小目标750 发表于 2019-7-2 12:20
感谢回复!
记住了, “those”这一类可以裸奔!

不过提醒一下楼主,those裸奔是不完全指代,而且必须要加限定修饰才可以哦,这边的those之所以后面不用加名词是因为后面有with结构
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 01:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部