标题: LSAT5II-4问题请教 [打印本页] 作者: albert 时间: 2003-6-24 05:02 标题: LSAT5II-4问题请教 4. A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive, taking second place to the total environment. Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept. They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for public use.
Which one of the statements below follows logically from the statements in the passage?
(A) Unobtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional.
(B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not unobtrusive.
(C) An architect with a strong personality cannot produce buildings that functional well for the public.
(D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.
(E) A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect’s personality and be functional for public use. 答案：B 这道题目以前被江湖中闻名遐迩的joywzy的问过 可是我看了一下没有最后答案。。 我认为没有一个是正确的。。 B:不正确的理由： functional for public use ---> unobtrusive (1) personality take over works ----> not functional for public use (2) (1)的否命题和（1） 不等价 所以，B personality take over -----> not unobtrusive 不对
请大家解答解答。
[此贴子已经被作者于2003-6-24 5:05:17编辑过]
作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-6-24 07:19
I agree that none of the choice is corret.作者: mzyzhu 时间: 2003-6-24 16:09
I agree with you. we have also discussed this Q before.
