ChaseDream

标题: prep1-99 [打印本页]

作者: 笨笨可可 时间: 2008-7-28 08:45
标题: prep1-99

A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.

(A) that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing

(B) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in

(C) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing

(D) creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in

(E) creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing

请问一下，我想排除A的理由是最后的resulting from是伴随状语，因为逻辑主语是creatures，所以不能用，因为results from逻辑主语应该是dwinde.

B中就不一样，因为as a result of 前面的dwindling?

作者: 笨笨可可 时间: 2008-7-28 08:48

请问as a result of一般是修饰前面的动作的表原因的吧？

作者: nemo11 时间: 2008-7-28 08:56

possibly resulting from increasing 是不是可以看成定语修饰suppliers呢？

SVO，doing 这种形式什么时候做定语什么时候做状语？

作者: SuccessMBA08 时间: 2008-8-22 11:56

以下是引用nemo11在2008-7-28 8:56:00的发言：

possibly resulting from increasing 是不是可以看成定语修饰suppliers呢？

SVO，doing 这种形式什么时候做定语什么时候做状语？

句尾＋，ving形式基本都是做伴随状语

作者: 锦城碎叶 时间: 2009-2-24 20:53

这句应该错在increasing上吧，其逻辑主语为the creature，语义不对

作者: jingjing6688 时间: 2009-4-4 12:23

顶一下~

作者: dolaimi 时间: 2009-5-23 08:41
请问as a result of 是作什么成分,在修饰句子还是前面的动词呢?

作者: AlienX 时间: 2009-5-24 15:20
狀語.
都acceptable. 都沒有歧異.

作者: susieshen 时间: 2009-6-8 15:59

恩，版主GG解释好简单，

还是不明白为什么B不行呢？

作者: AlienX 时间: 2009-6-9 01:06
B是答案呢 =.=|||

作者: ggghost 时间: 2009-6-9 09:35

resulting from 这里产生ambiguity,可能是suffer from的伴随状语，可能是dwindling food suppliers的补语

作者: leeron 时间: 2009-6-11 10:48
我的理解A和B很大的差异还在于reselting from和as a result of，这里是Ron的一个回复

consensus is that you just can't have 'resulting from' after a comma.


you can have it as an adjective modifier, without a comma - as in the following sentence:

the flooding resulting from the abnormally strong storms had left six inches of standing water in the street.

note that the boldface is an adjective modifier, modifying 'flooding'.


it appears that on the gmat, as well as in standard written english
in general, 'resulting from' after a comma is generally considered
unacceptable.

choice b features the standard use of a prepositional phrase as an adverb modifier:

'(possibly) as a result of', like other prepositional phrases that follow commas, serves to modify the action of the preceding clause (i.e., were dwindling).  this is totally standard usage, so make sure you know it.


http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/a-study-of-food-resources-in-the-north-pacific-between-1989-t1061.html

作者: jean1280 时间: 2009-6-24 16:46
up

作者: Brilliance 时间: 2009-7-23 15:21
求解

作者: illcf 时间: 2009-7-23 15:28

以下是引用SuccessMBA08在2008/8/22 11:56:00的发言：

句尾＋，ving形式基本都是做伴随状语

是不是。VING这种形式在句尾可做状语也可做定语啊因此此题该种用法造成歧义了？

作者: linyqiong 时间: 2009-8-7 16:57

以下是引用笨笨可可在2008/7/28 8:45:00的发言：

(A) that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing

(B) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in

(C) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing

(D) creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in

(E) creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing

请问一下，我想排除A的理由是最后的resulting from是伴随状语，因为逻辑主语是creatures，所以不能用，因为results from逻辑主语应该是dwinde.

B中就不一样，因为as a result of 前面的dwindling?

对A的解释是对的，因为resulting逻辑主语错了；B中as a result of作状语，没有逻辑主语问题

作者: yangfan8587 时间: 2009-8-10 01:32

kankan

作者: 陈梓 时间: 2009-11-18 08:59
问

作者: 陈梓 时间: 2009-12-13 11:09

作者: running2k 时间: 2010-1-18 05:14

我的理解A和B很大的差异还在于reselting from和as a result of，这里是Ron的一个回复

consensus is that you just can't have 'resulting from' after a comma.

you can have it as an adjective modifier, without a comma - as in the following sentence:

the flooding resulting from the abnormally strong storms had left six inches of standing water in the street.

note that the boldface is an adjective modifier, modifying 'flooding'.

it appears that on the gmat, as well as in standard written english
in general, 'resulting from' after a comma is generally considered
unacceptable.
choice b features the standard use of a prepositional phrase as an adverb modifier:

'(possibly) as a result of', like other prepositional phrases that follow commas, serves to modify the action of the preceding clause (i.e., were dwindling). this is totally standard usage, so make sure you know it.

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/a-study-of-food-resources-in-the-north-pacific-between-1989-t1061.html

-- by 会员 leeron (2009/6/11 10:48:00)

从A看，SVO，V+ing，这个"，V+ing"做结果状语从句和伴随状语从句都是逻辑上讲不通的，只有变成定语从句，才能讲通。那是不是如果有逗号的话，V+ing就不能做前面的的定语了呢？

作者: jiaxizou 时间: 2010-2-19 00:46
在我看来A项初次阅读并无大碍，但是仔细分析还是有如下2点错误：
1. resulting from用法确实不对，我很赞同楼上一位引用老外解析的观点，我也在goole搜索了一下确实resulting from多用于定语修饰前面的名词结构，而resulting from前面加了一个逗号的句子确实很少见。这里我跟偏向于理解resulting from修饰的是food supplies，而不是状语结构。如果是状语的话，第一排除伴随状语的可能，试想suffering和resulting from是同一个时间的动作？完全不可能。其二原因状语也不可能，我翻了google根本也没有找到resulting from做原因状语的任何证据，(只看到了because,as,for等原因状语的用法）还是前面我提到的，resulting from基本上都是做定语修饰前面的名词为多。
2. doing用法的错误，gmat也特别喜欢拿这个东西来做文章。前几遍复习的时候我一直都忽视了这个考点。dwindling作为形容词修饰food supplies是错误的，因为前面已经强调动作发生在过去were的出现，所以这里的dwindiling应该改成过去式dwindled。你肯定要说B也是用的dwindling。麻烦再仔细看看，B中dwindling是动词而非A中的形容词。
其次，increasing用法错误，大家都注意到了。跟上面意思差不多强调的是正在进行的过程中，所以错误。

作者: jiaxizou 时间: 2010-2-19 00:49
哈哈，忘记格式，不方便看哈。再发一次。

在我看来A项初次阅读并无大碍，但是仔细分析还是有如下2点错误：

1. resulting from用法确实不对，我很赞同楼上一位引用老外解析的观点，我也在goole搜索了一下确实resulting from多用于定语修饰前面的名词结构，而resulting from前面加了一个逗号的句子确实很少见。这里我跟偏向于理解resulting from修饰的是food supplies，而不是状语结构。如果是状语的话，第一排除伴随状语的可能，试想suffering和resulting from是同一个时间的动作？完全不可能。其二原因状语也不可能，我翻了google根本也没有找到resulting from做原因状语的任何证据，(只看到了because,as,for等原因状语的用法）还是前面我提到的，resulting from基本上都是做定语修饰前面的名词为多。

2. doing用法的错误，gmat也特别喜欢拿这个东西来做文章。前几遍复习的时候我一直都忽视了这个考点。dwindling作为形容词修饰food supplies是错误的，因为前面已经强调动作发生在过去were的出现，所以这里的dwindiling应该改成过去式dwindled。你肯定要说B也是用的dwindling。麻烦再仔细看看，B中dwindling是动词而非A中的形容词。

其次，increasing用法错误，大家都注意到了。跟上面意思差不多强调的是正在进行的过程中，所以错误。

作者: slamshady 时间: 2010-4-13 20:31
同意LS观点，dwindling在这里应该是动词而不是形容词，同suffering一样，表示一种正在发生的过程。。。

作者: kily8878860 时间: 2010-9-11 08:46
我有一个问题，虽然与题目无关，但也是分词结尾作修饰的，如果不是resulting 而是其他doing
S1 reveal/say/indicate that S2+V+O doing
S1 reveal/say/indicate that S2+V+O , doing
S1 reveal/say/indicate that S2+V+O done
S1 reveal/say/indicate that S2+V+O , done
分词从上到下分别是修饰哪一部分的呢，单独的SVO+分词的形式好判断，但是这个时候呢
盼望NN的解答
谢谢

作者: kily8878860 时间: 2010-9-11 08:46
自己顶一下

作者: kily8878860 时间: 2010-9-11 09:14
为什么这个帖子始终不能置顶啊

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)