标题: each nn, please take a look. [打印本页] 作者: ninishine 时间: 2003-10-11 11:32 标题: each nn, please take a look. Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the chairman of a corporation to the stockholders. A number of charges have been raised against me, some serious, some trivial. Individuals seeking to control the corporation for their own purposes have demanded my resignation. Remember that no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense whatsoever. In the American tradition, as you know, an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty. Furthermore, as the corporation’s unbroken six-year record of growth will show, my conduct of my official duties as chairman has only helped enhance the success of the corporation, and so benefited every stockholder. Which of the following can be properly inferred from the excerpt? c (A) The chairman believes that all those who have demanded his resignation are motivated by desire to control the corporation for their own purposes. (B) Any misdeeds that the chairman may have committed were motivated by his desire to enhance the success of the corporation. (C) The chairman is innocent of any criminal offense. (D) The corporation has expanded steadily over the past six years. (E) Any legal proceedings against the chairman have resulted in his acquittal.
the answer is D. why? isn't it stated in the content? isn't OG said a "infer" answer can't be found in the content? Why is C wrong.作者: ninishine 时间: 2003-10-11 12:05
I know it's not a hard question, some one must know about it. please help me if you can, I'm really confused about this kind of "infer" question.作者: dorbear 时间: 2003-10-11 12:45
ninishine, there are some kind of 'infer' answers go out directly from the content, this is one of them, it is just not that conceptual.作者: ninishine 时间: 2003-10-12 01:03
Thank you for answering. but why A isn't right? it also goes out from the content. Is it because A used the word "all" then it's too extreme to be correct? really appreciate your help.