小安阅读求解答

纯洁小二郎

What accounts for this upsurge in unionization among clerical workers?First, more women have entered the work force in the past few years, and moreof them plan to remain working until retirement age. Consequently, they areprobably more concerned than their predecessors were about job security andeconomic benefits. Also, the women’s movement has succeeded in legitimizing theeconomic and political activism of women on their own behalf, thereby producinga more positive attitude toward unions. The absence of any comparable increasein unionization among private-sector clerical workers, however, identifies theprimary catalyst—the structural change in the multi-occupational public-sectorunions themselves. Over the past twenty years, the occupational distribution inthese unions has been steadily shifting from predominantly blue-collar topredominantly white-collar. Because there are far more women in white-collarjobs, an increase in the proportion of female members has accompanied theoccupational shift and has altered union policy-making in favor of organizingwomen and addressing women’s issues.

7.     Theauthor implies that if the increase in the number of women in the work forceand the impact of the women’s movement werethe main causes of the rise in unionization of public-sector clerical workers,then

(A) more womenwould hold administrative positions in unions

(B) more womenwho hold political offices would have positive attitudes toward labor unions

(C) there wouldbe an equivalent rise in unionization of private-sector clerical workers

(D) unionswould have shown more interest than they have in organizing women（C）

(E) theincrease in the number of unionized public-sector clerical workers would havebeen greater than it has been

小安阅读17篇，求大神解答。 还有此类虚拟语气题目该如何解答

小仙女啊小流氓

我的理解是，之前提到的两种解释如果是正确的话，那么在private的情况下也会有同样的上升，但实际上，文中用了一个however，也就是表达出对前面的否定，也就是说前两者的解释可能不对，正确的解释应该是structural change

纯洁小二郎

小仙女啊小流氓 发表于 2017-9-8 21:36
我的理解是，之前提到的两种解释如果是正确的话，那么在private的情况下也会有同样的上升，但实际上，文中 ...

懂了！！，多谢