ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1761|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC总结] OG-sc-730有个选项不是很懂

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-9-19 10:44:35 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.

(A) arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
(B) arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
(C) a treatise that advocates women’s equal political and legal rights
(D) a treatise advocating women’s equal political and legal rights
(E) a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women


OG-sc-730。这道题选E很明显。但想问下大神们A选项,arguing in a treatise是做主句的伴随状语,还是做discourse的非限制性定语?
我看有种说法是argue的主语只能是论文不能是人,因为人是借助论文这个媒介来argue的。想求证一下。

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2017-9-19 11:54:14 | 只看该作者
应该是后者

传送给楼主Helr大神的完整解析:https://gmat.la/question/OG2016-SC-60
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 02:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部