Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fi sheries and oil fi elds of large sea areas, they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands. (A) Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fi sheries and oil fi elds of large sea areas, they have already stimulated (B) Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fi sheries and oil fi elds of large sea areas, it has already stimulated (C) Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fi sheries and oil fi elds of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, already stimulating (D) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fi sheries and oil fi elds of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, this has already stimulated (E) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fi sheries and oil fi elds of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, which is already stimulating 看了OG解释，发现当时自己排除选项的办法非常不科学： 因为觉得under provisions of...感觉比较awkward wordy就直接排除了 发现OG说可以有这种用法， 只是其位置的放置导致了有sea areas under provisions 的歧义。 想请问下，如果还是用这个under provision of...可以怎样用吖·· 感觉这个问题 很弱，不过本人比较死脑筋，不能完全搞懂心里就有点忐忑，麻烦各位了··
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-7-22 22:23:45
收藏
收藏
楼主
