主语和谓语之间可以有两个修饰语么？

magicianz · 发表于 2011-6-28 22:59:03

247. (GWD-3-Q39)
Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride.
A.   Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,
B.   Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, they cost less,
C.   Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, in comparison with most sport utility vehicles, and have a lower cost, they
D.   Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,
E.   Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles the cost is lower, and they

题目释义：Minivans carry…and, [compared with…, cost…, get…, allow…, and have….]
...V1 and，插入状语，V2...
考点：
平行结构（parallelism）逻辑意思（logical predication）
1.   按照逻辑意思可以发现，动作carry和后面几个动作并不平行。这个句子的逻辑关系是，“Carry”这个动作没有参加“compared”，而是自成一个层次，而另外四个动词是“compared”的项目，它们另外组成了一连串的动词平行结构。故而A中的第一个“and”是必要的。
2.   compared with用法见prep1-241
选项分析：
A.   Correct；carry和后面的四个动作是大平行，cost，get，allow and have是小平行；and后面省略了主语。
B.   Minivan和they双重主语，错误；compared with修饰对象成了前面的定语从句。
C.   Run-on sentence，两套主谓宾结构；打破了原来逻辑含义合理的各动词平行结构。
D.   曾经的争议选项；compared with结构有修饰前面的carrying as many as seven passengers的歧义，dangling modifier。
E.   前半个分句有两个主语Minivans和the cost；Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers成了悬垂结构；打破了原先逻辑含义合理的各动词平行结构。

我的问题是，D不可以是不是因为成为了 S , adj, adj, V这种形式一般是不好的，GMAC不允许的结构？
或者说又出现过这种形式的正确句子么？
谢谢各位指点~~

magicianz · 发表于 2011-6-30 02:41:00

有哪位高人可以指点一下么？

magicianz · 发表于 2011-7-1 00:57:54

求教啊~~

本贴相关题目 GMATPrep-2008E1-SC-247 | TN-02-SC-39 (LXOQ)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

主语和谓语之间可以有两个修饰语么？

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()