prep1-85 没有找到历史提问记录

85.       (29201-!-item-!-188;#058&003882)

In 1945, after a career as First Lady in which she shattered expectations more audaciously than either Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison ever had been, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman.

(A) more audaciously than either Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison ever had been, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman

(B) more audaciously than either Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison, President Harry S Truman had Eleanor Roosevelt appointed to be a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly

(C) with an audacity never matched in the case of Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison, President Harry S Truman had Eleanor Roosevelt appointed as a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly

(D) with an audacity never matched by Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman

(E) with an audacity never matched either in the case of Abigail Adams or of Dolly Madison's, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed to be a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman

answer: D

根据主语应该是Eleanor Roosevelt排除BC, appoint to be复杂化排除E, 剩下A和D.在两者间徘徊.最终选了A,A为什么不行呢？

顶，有没有人帮忙看一下啊？

A选项我觉得...ever had been时态有问题

btw:prep的资料在那里下载？我怎么找不到啊？

下载 PREP完整VERBAL全套http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=34&ID=245414&page=1

prep语法总结http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=206655&page=1

数学部分http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=34&ID=250699&page=1

谢谢解答，不过还是不太明白

A项不可以理解为Abigail Adams 和 Dolly Madison是在Eleanor Roosevelt之前的人么，这样用ever had been难道也有问题么？

我认为A中

more audaciously 有就近修饰expectations 的歧义 ， 副词不能修饰形容词。所以排除 A

不知道LZ是否同意

(D) with an audacity never matched by Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman

我的问题是D. audacity never matched by AA or DM, 这里逻辑上匹配吗?为什么不用 never matched by that of AA or DM?

谢谢。

是所有的结构都要求结构对等吗 是不是  with an audacity never matched by Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison 也可以讲的通 不要求对等

谁能详细解释一下这句话啊 "Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison ever had been结构中,had been省略结构无法还原, 也就是说had been无法承接she shattered进行省略" 是不是可以理解为had been后面无法还原合适的词 可不可以理解为ever had been audaciously 呢

那个match的不知道怎么说

但后面那个应该可以这样解释吧。

she shattered expectations more audaciously than either Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison ever had been

she did something 怎么怎么样 than either A or D did.

用been的话就找不到前面对应的be了

至于完成时还是一般时，个人倾向选一般现在，但说不出原因