[求助]og195一个不明白的地方,请帮忙看看!

lwei1016 · 发表于 2004-3-21 23:01:00

195. Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign substance.

(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at

(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to

(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at

(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to

(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at

答案是E.

不懂C的错误的解释while C violates sense by having all the antibodies specifically targeted at an, that is, one, invading microbe or substance. 请大牛帮忙啊

dreadpower · 发表于 2004-3-21 23:04:00

     呵呵，这个我在行啊，我学生物的~~~~~~

     C说所有抗体不能只和一个抗原结合，

         基本的免疫学知识：一个抗原和一个抗体结合

lwei1016 · 发表于 2004-3-21 23:22:00

谢谢

cocoabean · 发表于 2004-4-5 06:57:00

me too , thanks,NN

new_land · 发表于 2005-10-10 23:06:00

原来是常识！！！

谢谢NN！

milanforever · 发表于 2005-11-30 13:53:00

应该说：“原来是NN的常识“。

又长见识了！多谢！

2000000006 · 发表于 2005-11-30 16:04:00

each targeted specifically at an invading microbe or foreign substance在原来句子中作何种成分哪？

titatita · 发表于 2006-2-8 22:02:00

同位语

weiweiforever · 发表于 2006-2-9 01:45:00

我觉得ETS这里不是考常识，而且这个DD不是学生物的估计不是很清楚吧，汗一个，反正我不知道，呵呵

while C violates sense by having all the antibodies specifically targeted at an, that is, one, invading microbe or substance

我觉得ets的意思应该是all和specifically的矛盾，既然是all怎么可能specifically呢，

小女子愚见，呵呵

juliet01192000 · 发表于 2006-3-28 09:16:00

以下是引用2000000006在2005-11-30 16:04:00的发言：
each targeted specifically at an invading microbe or foreign substance在原来句子中作何种成分哪？

是独立主格。：）

[求助]og195一个不明白的地方,请帮忙看看!

[求助]og195一个不明白的地方,请帮忙看看!

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()