关于代词指代的疑惑。求指导！

情未浓 · 发表于 2011-11-21 11:27:26

OG-101题：
Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

(A) Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

(B) An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.

(C) An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.

(D) Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.

(E) Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

OA:E。无疑问。

在总结过程中，看到C选项的分析。manhattan里面Ron说C中it指代不清。是因为它两个可能的前体都是介宾，即都与it不平行，所以it指代二者都有可能。（"a course of action" & "incipient trouble"都是介词后的名词，而it是从句的主语）

我的问题是：（离开这道题....）
如果某个代词有多个前体，且代词和这些前体不平行。根据白勇语法里面的代词查找顺序，是否认为：当正确的前体较其他错误前体位于高一级顺序时，代词的指代没有歧义？
可能这句话有点绕。。我不知道我表达清楚没有。举个例子：正确的前体名词是宾语，错误的可能前体名词是介宾成分，代词在句子某从句作主语，那么是不是认为这个代词的指代没有歧义？

求指导！！！

doudoulong1302 · 发表于 2011-11-21 11:55:18

我的理解是啊指代不清是指代词前面有好几个指代后逻辑意思都通的名词这时候这个代词就不知道是哪个了不会歧义的指代是这个代词之前只有一个合理的指代词能使后面的意思通。不知道你看懂没·····

情未浓 · 发表于 2011-11-21 13:02:58

我的理解是啊指代不清是指代词前面有好几个指代后逻辑意思都通的名词这时候这个代词就不知道是哪个了不会歧义的指代是这个代词之前只有一个合理的指代词能使后面的意思通。不知道你看懂没·····

-- by 会员 doudoulong1302 (2011/11/21 11:55:18)

那照你这么说，OG-101题中就不存在指代不清了啊。因为只有a course of action这一个合理地名词。而incipient trouble显然是逻辑意思不通的。
或者你的意思是代词之前只有一个单复吻合的名词可以指代？

那OG-106题正确选项C:
Morconi conceived of the radio as a tool for private conversation that could substitute for the telephone;instead, it has become precisely the opposite, a tool for communicating with a large, public audience.
这里it答案说是明确指代the radio，而不是指代private conversation或者telephone，没有歧义。

情未浓 · 发表于 2011-11-22 07:57:32

来个人理我下。。。

关于代词指代的疑惑。求指导！

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()