ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1547|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新prep语法题讨论~nn请进~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-2 15:17:24 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式


1. Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used satellite images to tally deforested areas, where farmers and ranchers have clear-cut and burned all the trees, but such work has not addressed either logging, which is the removal of only selected trees, as well as surface fires, burning down individual trees but do not denude the forest.

A. which is the removal of only selected trees, as well as surface fires, burning

B. which removes only selected trees, or surface fires that burn

C. which removes only selected trees, along with surface fires that burn

D. removing only selected trees, or surface fires, burning

E. removing only selected trees, as well as surface fires that burn

答案是B,请问D有什么问题?

2.
Not only didi the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland(especially in the Northest) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it



答案D, 请问E错在哪里?not only.. but also..中also 再GMAT 中可不可以省略?

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-2 16:44:37 | 只看该作者
NN帮忙呀~
板凳
发表于 2010-3-2 16:58:43 | 只看该作者
D有歧义。。。。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-2 17:02:28 | 只看该作者
谢谢kevin,能说的更详细一点吗?
5#
发表于 2010-3-2 17:16:29 | 只看该作者
就是说logging, removing or .....感觉是这样的  第二题e 的it指代不明,而且主要考平行吧
6#
发表于 2010-3-2 23:24:40 | 只看该作者
1、这里的burn....只是对fire的限制性定语,不能变成后置burning。。。那种是非限制性的修饰语
2、not only..but also...表示的并列,链接的两个句子意思不能表示转折。你可以再读原文:前面一句说的是带来的便利,后面一句说的是不好的影响。这里的but只是单纯的转折词。。。
7#
发表于 2010-3-3 14:28:25 | 只看该作者
1. D的问题  burning down 和 未划线部分do not denude 结构不对称
2. 同LS
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 04:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部