ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2410|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助:大全787没人问的问题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-2-24 07:59:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
256. The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.



(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.



(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.



(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.



(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder’s nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.E



(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.



E, the best choice, conveys its meaning clearly, without ambiguity, and uses straightforward syntax. In A, the placement of the phrase in two letters to the historian Tacitus generates ambiguity: the nonsensical suggestion is that the eruption of Vesuvius took place in the letters themselves. In B, the verb phrase that begins being the only eyewitness accounts modifies the subject of the preceding clause, suggesting nonsensically that the nephew of Pliny the Elder himself was the eyewitness accounts. Furthermore, To the historian Tacitus, the nephew... wrote two letters is unnecessarily clumsy. In C, the meaning of the sentence is unclear (The only eyewitness account of what?), the repetition of account is clumsy, and the syntax is highly convoluted (... in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account...). In D, Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder’s nephew accounted is redundant, and the placement of in two letters to the historian Tacitus generates ambiguity, suggesting under one available reading that the eruption took place in the letters.
对于A,错在哪啊?介词短语的位置有没有NN总结一下啊?我实在是弄不明白。谢谢了~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-2-24 11:19:04 | 只看该作者
是不是问题太简单了啊?怎么没人回答呢
板凳
发表于 2011-2-24 11:44:43 | 只看该作者
是不是问题太简单了啊?怎么没人回答呢
-- by 会员 termaze (2011/2/24 11:19:04)



hahahha 其实是因为排版....题目看起来有点累...

A :the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus. ,is trying to sense it like the eruption occured in two letters.
whereas in E it is clearly stated that it is the first object ,subject wrote.
地板
发表于 2011-2-24 12:06:29 | 只看该作者
LS的解释很完美!
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-2-27 04:57:58 | 只看该作者
好像明白了,谢谢了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 06:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部