ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2663|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-1-16

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-8 15:06:00 | 只看该作者

gwd-1-16

Q16:


Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.




  • a greater proportion than it was

  • a greater proportion than

  • a greater proportion than they have been

  • which is greater than was so

  • which is greater than it has been

  • 答案是c,但是为什么不选b呢?谢谢指教

    沙发
    发表于 2005-8-8 16:02:00 | 只看该作者

    我选的是B,


    C时态不对。

    板凳
    发表于 2005-8-10 22:39:00 | 只看该作者
    我也选B
    地板
    发表于 2005-8-10 22:42:00 | 只看该作者
    而且C中的"they"没有指代对象,从句意上应该指代"proportion",但从语法上又说不通。
    5#
    发表于 2008-5-3 22:59:00 | 只看该作者

    应该是,TV costs accounted a greater proportion in 1992 than (they did) in any previous election

    they 指代 TV costs

    6#
    发表于 2008-5-4 10:54:00 | 只看该作者

    如果THEY指代TV COSTS,那就更应该选B了吧...

    7#
    发表于 2009-7-16 07:09:00 | 只看该作者
    8#
    发表于 2009-7-16 07:25:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用z198424在2005/8/8 15:06:00的发言:

    Q16:

    Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

    1. a greater proportion than it was
    2. a greater proportion than
    3. a greater proportion than they have been
    4. which is greater than was so
    5. which is greater than it has been

    答案是c,但是为什么不选b呢?谢谢指教

    应该选B.

    a greater than后面应该是一个从句表达以往电视广告费用在总统选举费用中的比例,这个从句有3种选择:

    1)完全写完整:than the television costs accounted for... in any previous election.

    2) 简化主语谓语:than they did in any previous election.

    3) 省略主谓只留下状语:than in any previous election.

    3)应该是最简洁的最好的方式。

    C选项是想采用2)的省略方式,但是时态不对,而且accounted for是实意动词,应该用do,did等来省略,have been是系统词,不能用来省略实意动词。

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    IESE MBA
    近期活动

    正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 23:43
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部