ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1555|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全76(sec12-12)自己的解释,请NN看看有问题吗

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-4-29 11:59:00 | 只看该作者

大全76(sec12-12)自己的解释,请NN看看有问题吗

76/sec12-12Although all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were not carried live, Soviet audiences have seen a great deal of coverage(新闻报道).

(A) all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were not carried live

(B) all the Communist party conference’s Moscow proceedings were not carried live

(C) all the Communist party conference Moscow proceedings have not been carried alive

(D) not all the Communist party conference Moscow proceedings have been carried aliveE

(E) not all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were carried live

     针对之前的帖子中,大家一直在讨论的关于all not和not all是否一样,如果一样为什么选E不选A的问题,我查了例句,想这样解释:

     首先它们两个都是半否定,确定无疑。但似乎all在其中充当的成分不同,如

Not all men are wise.

Not all the wealth in the world can buy.

此两句中all是adj.,后可接n.

但是,

          All is not gold that glitters.(闪闪发光物,未必尽黄金)  All为代词

          All that glitters is not gold.(译文同上)  All为名词

若用all not 表半否定时,以上两种形式All均不作形容词,后面不接名词。本题中显然all想用来修饰后面the proceeding of... ...的,所以应用Not all形式。

不知道这样解释对吗,请牛牛指点,希望对大家有帮助。

 

沙发
发表于 2009-4-29 13:40:00 | 只看该作者
很多人會把determiner和adjective混為一談, anyway, 反正知道用法就可 =)
我看了Garner's Modern American English, 它只說all...not會有ambiguity, 沒說為什麼.  我猜是因為是all...not的結構很多時候author是想表not all(半否定).  如果要表全否定, 應該用none.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 05:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部