GWD1-6回顾 Q15、17

  Why firms adhere to or deviate

      from their strategic plans is poorly

      understood.  However, theory and

Line    limited research suggest that the

  (5)   process through which such plans

emerge may play a part.  In particular,

top management decision-sharing—

consensus-oriented, team-based

decision-making—may increase the

(10)   likelihood that firms will adhere to their

plans, because those involved in the

decision-making may be more com-

mitted to the chosen course of action,

thereby increasing the likelihood that

(15)   organizations will subsequently adhere

to their plans.

      However, the relationship between

top management decision-sharing and

adherence to plans may be affected

(20)   by a firm’s strategic mission (its fun-

      damental approach to increasing

      sales revenue and market share, and

generating cash flow and short-term

profits).  At one end of the strategic

(25)   mission continuum, “build” strategies

are pursued when a firm desires to

increase its market share and is willing

to sacrifice short-term profits to do so.

At the other end, “harvest” strategies

(30)   are used when a firm is willing to

sacrifice marked share for short-term

profitability and cash-flow maximiza-

      tion.  Research and theory suggest

that top management decision-sharing

(35) may have a more positive relationship

with adherence to plans among firms

with harvest strategies than among

firms with build strategies.  In a study

     of strategic practices in several large

(40)  firms, managers in harvest strategy

scenarios were more able to adhere

to their business plans.  As one of the

managers in the study explained it,

this is partly because “[t]ypically all a

(45)   manager has to do [when implementing

a harvest strategy] is that which was

done last year.”  Additionally, man-

agers under harvest strategies may

have fewer strategic options than do

(50)   those under build strategies; it may

therefore be easier to reach agree-

ment on a particular course of action

through decision-sharing, which will

in turn tend to promote adherence

(55)   to plans.  Conversely, in a “build”

strategy scenario, individual leader-

ship, rather than decision-sharing,

may promote adherence to plans.

Build strategies—which typically

(60)   require leaders with strong perso-

nal visions for a firm’s future, rather

than the negotiated compromise

of the team-based decision—may

be most closely adhered to when

(65)   implemented in the context of a clear

strategic vision of an individual leader,

rather than through the practice of

decision-sharing.

15.

1) B写了” refute”,全文从头到尾也没说这个意思.

2) B写了” two different theories”,全文从头到尾也没说这个意思.

你好象没看懂这篇文章.再看看吧.

加油啊!!!!

没啥套路.把文章看懂就行.

那第一段中的theory and limited research提出的是一个观点吧，

第二段开头的又是一个观点吧。

第一段的limited是不是表现了作者对第一种观点的负评价呢？

如果高手觉得我这样理解的不对，那请教一下应该怎样理解？多谢了！