ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Growing competitive pressures may be encouraging auditors to bend the rules in favor of clients; auditors may, for instance, allow a questionable loan to remain on the books in order to maintain a bank's profits on paper.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 8142|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]OG74

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-4-28 22:34:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]OG74

74.            Growing competitive pressures may be encouraging auditors to bend the rules in favor of clients; auditors may, for instance, allow a questionable loan to remain on the books in order to maintain a bank’s profits on paper.


(A) clients; auditors may, for instance, allow


(B) clients, as an instance, to allow


(C) clients, like to allow


(D) clients, such as to be allowingA


(E) clients; which might, as an instance, be the allowing of


The first independent clause of the sentence describes a general situation; in A, the best choice, a second independent clause clearly and grammatically presents an example of this circumstance. Choice B uses as an instance ungrammatically: as an instance requires of to form such idiomatic constructions as “She cited x as an instance of y. Also, this construction cannot link infinitives such as to bend and to allow. The infinitive is again incorrect in C and D. C misuses like, a comparative preposition, to introduce an example. D requires by in place of to be. E, aside from being wordy and imprecise, uses the pronoun which to refer vaguely to the whole preceding clause rather than to a specific noun referent.



答案没问题:D requires by in place of to be 这里D变成 such as by allowing…在这可以作为一个正确选项吗?Growing competitive pressures…., such as by allowing这里allowing的施动者优先是growing competitive pressures, 逻辑上是auditors… rules.., such as by allowing.

沙发
发表于 2004-4-28 22:49:00 | 只看该作者
In my view, it means "  to encourage <auditors to bend rules..  such as by allowing>"
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-28 23:09:00 | 只看该作者

Thanks mariezhu.


But I am still puzzled.


As what you present, auditors to bend rules.. such as by allowing, I vote for your view because you eliminate the comma before such as. Consequently, logic subject of "allowing" is auditors, the parrallel structure is auditors....rules..such as...;


In D, a comma places before "such as", may the comma cause the ambiguous logic subject for "allowing"???


To be discussed....

地板
发表于 2005-1-22 15:38:00 | 只看该作者

同样的问题!

还有一点,such as可以接介词吗?

5#
发表于 2005-1-22 15:41:00 | 只看该作者
可以的,不过那是名词的省略形式。
6#
发表于 2005-1-22 15:53:00 | 只看该作者
如果是省略的话,such as by allowing是如何省略的呢?还是ETS的这个解释并不意味着such as by allowing从语法上来讲是正确的呢?
7#
发表于 2005-4-2 22:54:00 | 只看该作者

I m confused by the same question above.

8#
发表于 2005-4-14 16:18:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用weiyu在2004-4-28 23:09:00的发言:

Thanks mariezhu.


But I am still puzzled.


As what you present, auditors to bend rules.. such as by allowing, I vote for your view because you eliminate the comma before such as. Consequently, logic subject of "allowing" is auditors, the parrallel structure is auditors....rules..such as...;


In D, a comma places before "such as", may the comma cause the ambiguous logic subject for "allowing"???


To be discussed....



Up
请大家帮忙解答一下吧,谢谢!
9#
发表于 2005-6-22 13:20:00 | 只看该作者


如果D的逗号会引起歧义的话,那A岂不是也是有可能犯同一个错误?我觉得像举例这些词一般也有个“ 就近原则“

10#
发表于 2005-9-15 03:20:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用而今迈步从头越在2005-1-22 15:53:00的发言:
如果是省略的话,such as by allowing是如何省略的呢?还是ETS的这个解释并不意味着such as by allowing从语法上来讲是正确的呢?


我觉得是这样省略的,nn帮忙看看对不对: ...encourage auditors to b end the rules in favor of clients by allowing ....


such as在这里是举例,所以直接加在方式方法by allowing前面即可。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 00:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部