呵呵,我觉得这里最大的问题就在于你没有写出来的那部分。
Because local elections typically invovle smaller amounts of money and present less oportunity for abuse than national elections, the rules that govern local political contributions are less stringent than national contributions. local election 和rules都有清晰的比较对象,national contributions.
The rules that govern political contributions are less stringent in local elections than they are in national elections because local elections typically involve smaller amounts of money and present less opportunity for abuse. Beacause之前的部分比较对象很清晰,The rules in local elections和they in national elections比较 但是local elections和谁比较,比较对象没有了。从这句话里得不出比较对象就一定是 national election.ETS的逻辑是如果你推得出比较对象一致你就能省,得不出就不能省。我可以说local election和foreign election比较,如果合同这样写不是让人钻空子了吗?
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-2-7 20:56:09编辑过] |