ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2049|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

语法求解-OG108

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-2-28 23:23:29 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
108.    Authoritative parents are more likely than permissive
parents to have children who as adolescents are self-
confident, high in self-esteem, and responsibly
independent.

(A)    Authoritative parents are more likely than
permissive parents to have children who as
adolescents are self-confident, high in self-
esteem, and responsibly independent.
(B)    Authoritative parents who are more likely than
permissive parents to have adolescent children
that are self-confident, high in self-esteem, and
responsibly independent.
(C)    Children of authoritative parents, rather than
permissive parents, are the more likely to be
self-confident, have a high self-esteem, and to
be responsibly independent as adolescents.
(D)    Children whose parents are authoritative rather
than being permissive, are more likely to have
self-confidence, a high self-esteem, and be
responsibly independent when they are an
adolescent.
(E)    Rather than permissive parents, the children of
authoritative parents are the more likely to have
self-confidence, a high self-esteem, and to be
responsibly independent as an adolescent.

本题OG正确答案A理解
问题在于E:the children of authoritative parents are the more likely...这句里面的the 多余吗?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-2-29 00:11:34 | 只看该作者
老兄,这帖子估计会沉的

因为SC学的是如何选出正确的答案,考场你得在50s内选出正确的答案,你根本没有时间纠结这个the是否多余。即便是平时训练,也没有这种the是否存在的排题情况
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-1 00:10:03 | 只看该作者
还是谢谢了,暂时不纠结了,往前面赶吧!
地板
发表于 2012-7-14 17:37:11 | 只看该作者
頂貼子, 我覺得好像這個the 多餘, 不過只要不是nature 這一類自然屬性的詞, 有the 沒the 似乎也不是那麼重要吧(PIA 飛~)

順便搭車同問, E 選項中的the children... as an adolescent 單複數有問題嗎?
5#
发表于 2012-7-14 19:44:24 | 只看该作者
答案应该是A,其余四个选项都有致命缺陷。

B,that不能指代children,不能指代人。
CDE,比较双方错误。

the确实多余,鉴于本身比较也不平衡的情况来说。an adolescent是有单复数问题。同时该句多余的还有the more likely。。。双方比较情况不加the。而且gmat本身禁止隐含比较级,比较级还是推荐than(关于这个不晓得近期有没有改动)。
6#
发表于 2012-7-14 20:25:15 | 只看该作者
肯定有问题的。和A比较一下就知,A children 和 adolescents 相辅相成,而E 一阵 children, 一阵adolescent,单复数混乱。
7#
发表于 2012-8-1 19:02:11 | 只看该作者
我的问题是:A 中,修饰children的定从who as adolescents are 。。。是non-essential 定语从句,按理说去掉non-essential定从,句子意思应该不变,但是去掉后意思变成,a比b更肯能生孩子,所以我觉得应该用essential定从,应该用that引导吧?
8#
发表于 2012-8-20 23:06:32 | 只看该作者
我的问题是:A 中,修饰children的定从who as adolescents are 。。。是non-essential 定语从句,按理说去掉non-essential定从,句子意思应该不变,但是去掉后意思变成,a比b更肯能生孩子,所以我觉得应该用essential定从,应该用that引导吧?
-- by 会员 supermanwx (2012/8/1 19:02:11)



楼上这位完全说错了,who可以引导essential 定语从句。按照Manhattan所述,判断一句定语从句的标准是该定语从句前是否有逗号。由此判定A选项中的定语从句是essential 定语从句。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 01:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部